@nsd000@anon597260576 They generally use:
- Neural Nets
- Random Forest
- Linear Regression
But, said linear regression is on a massive scale. You're minimizing it when you put it like that.
People don't understand how depressed most Great Men actually are.
*Napoleon wrote a paper called "On Suicide" at 16
*Hamilton wrote a letter saying he "wished there was a war" to make his name
*Churchill wrote countless letters about Loneliness
*Lincoln constantly wrote about being depressed
*Caesar weeped by a statue of Alexander the Great
*Newton wrote about being isolated at school
*Musk talks about how "people wouldn't want to be me"
*Beethoven writes that his art stopped him from suicide
This is a recurring pattern you see throughout history. Many greats are depressed in their youth. And often times, this is their driver towards action. They deal with their pain through pure action.
@KabbalaJihadist Clogging your DMs? I haven't DM'd you once.
I'm advising you as Muslims should. If you'll persist in bad actions then so be it. You're the one who'll deal with the consequences on the Day of Judgement.
@KabbalaJihadist Reread the definition of patriot.
An American patriot can despise the American Empire and favor isolationism.
Maybe that's the apparent to someone mentally retarded, but they shouldn't be making such judgements imo.
@KabbalaJihadist Reread the definition of intellectual dishonesty (you apparently are unaware of its definition).
You understand that the material you're providing is also being targeted towards Uyghur and Turkish Islamists alike?
Again, fear Allah.
@KabbalaJihadist Those insults are being hurled at Islamist and Kemalists equally by the Chinese over a disagreement regarding the genocide of Uyghurs.
The modern Turkish identity is not antithesis to Islam, and you're a fool if you truly believe that. It's built on Islam and being a Muslim.
To those who are angry about Ottoman conversion of Churches into Mosques:
This behavior is more Roman than Islamic. The Ottomans viewed themselves as Roman successors replacing Christianity with Islam, the way earlier Romans had replaced Paganism with Christianity.
The Ottomans followed the Roman script, but in a gentler way:
Romans destroyed temples to build churches. The Ottomans didn't destroy Churches, or use them as quarries, they kept them mostly as-is.
Catholics and Protestants destroyed and defaced icons. When Crusaders arrived in Istanbul, they pillaged, looted, and destroyed. The Ottomans didn't pillage, looted, and destroy icons, they covered them.
What the Ottomans did was liberal in comparison to their predecessors.
Having said all that, some still want buildings as Churches, here is my question:
What is important? That the buiding remains empty but nominally yours, or that it remains a sacred space?
I think a house of God is better full than empty, even if my community loses it. That's why I'm not concerned with reverting Churches in Spain and Sicily back into mosques.