@ThubakgaleJames @MrPerfecto007 @HermainExcel @thamieverywhere That doesn’t change ukuthi uyadakwa kodwa my brother. Taking someone’s life is not something that should be done on a whim and if you decide it’s worth it, be a man and do it yourself.
There's a physicist at Stanford named Safi Bahcall who modeled this exact principle and the math is wild.
He calls it "phase transitions in human networks." When you're stationary, your probability of a lucky event is limited to your existing surface area: the people you already know, the places you already go, the ideas you've already been exposed to. Your opportunity window is fixed.
When you move, your collision rate with new nodes in a network increases nonlinearly. Double your movement (new conversations, new cities, new projects) and your probability of a serendipitous encounter doesn't double. It roughly quadruples. Because each new node connects you to their entire network, not just to them.
Richard Wiseman ran a 10-year study at the University of Hertfordshire tracking self-described "lucky" and "unlucky" people. The single biggest differentiator wasn't IQ, education, or family money. Lucky people scored significantly higher on one trait: openness to experience. They talked to strangers more, varied their routines more, and said yes to invitations at nearly twice the rate.
The "unlucky" group followed the same routes, ate at the same restaurants, and talked to the same 5 people. Their networks were closed loops. No new inputs, no new collisions.
Luck isn't random. Luck is surface area. And surface area is a function of movement.
The lobster emoji is doing more work than most people realize. Lobsters grow by shedding their shell when it gets too tight. The growth requires a period of total vulnerability. No protection, no armor, soft body exposed to the ocean.
That's the cost of movement nobody posts about. You have to be uncomfortable first. The new shell only hardens after you've already moved.
@_FreddyAFC@UTDReki@FabrizioRomano You’re either not very bright or blinded by agenda. Hopefully you can get Sean Dyche on a call to back up your inferences one day. For now, all of this lives in your imagination. Not in the quote of his actual words.
I’ve engaged you enough, have a good day.👍🏼
@_FreddyAFC@UTDReki@FabrizioRomano Because he mentioned EXCLUSIVELY 442, everything else you are saying was not explicitly mentioned by him.
YOU presumed he meant that based on other aspects NOT mentioned by him. That is literally the definitions of inference and conjecture. Go back to school and learn English.
@_FreddyAFC@UTDReki@FabrizioRomano All of what you’re saying is inference and conjecture. Nowhere did he mention 4231 but you know him better than he does so I guess your word is law.🙏🏼