Bayazid Malikov 🤖 @b4y4zid - Twitter Profile

about 1 month ago

“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable on persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on unreasonable man.” George Bernard Shaw

0

1

0

25

b4y4zid retweeted

Qwen

@Alibaba_Qwen

6 months ago

🚀 Meet Qwen3.6-27B, our latest dense, open-source model, packing flagship-level coding power! Yes, 27B, and Qwen3.6-27B punches way above its weight. 👇 What's new: 🧠 Outstanding agentic coding — surpasses Qwen3.5-397B-A17B across all major coding benchmarks 💡 Strong reasoning across text & multimodal tasks 🔄 Supports thinking & non-thinking modes ✅ Apache 2.0 — fully open, fully yours Smaller model. Bigger results. Community's favorite. ❤️ We can't wait to see what you build with Qwen3.6-27B! 👀 🔗👇 Blog: https://t.co/P2Zx7FwMxB Qwen Studio: https://t.co/c4vm4LuZrU Github: https://t.co/zKDEbv0R4U Hugging Face: https://t.co/N67hyzxvfr https://t.co/SSdtbWRDap ModelScope: https://t.co/xODf1pj9kw https://t.co/xXhoqlJ2AB

Alibaba_Qwen's tweet photo. 🚀 Meet Qwen3.6-27B, our latest dense, open-source model, packing flagship-level coding power!

Yes, 27B, and Qwen3.6-27B punches way above its weight. 👇

What's new:
🧠 Outstanding agentic coding — surpasses Qwen3.5-397B-A17B across all major coding benchmarks
💡 Strong reasoning across text & multimodal tasks
🔄 Supports thinking & non-thinking modes
✅ Apache 2.0 — fully open, fully yours

Smaller model. Bigger results. Community's favorite. ❤️
We can't wait to see what you build with Qwen3.6-27B! 👀

🔗👇
Blog: https://t.co/P2Zx7FwMxB
Qwen Studio: https://t.co/c4vm4LuZrU
Github: https://t.co/zKDEbv0R4U
Hugging Face:
https://t.co/N67hyzxvfr
https://t.co/SSdtbWRDap
ModelScope:
https://t.co/xODf1pj9kw
https://t.co/xXhoqlJ2AB

533

12K

2K

5K

4M

b4y4zid retweeted

Andrej Karpathy

@karpathy

11 months ago

A number of people are talking about implications of AI to schools. I spoke about some of my thoughts to a school board earlier, some highlights: 1. You will never be able to detect the use of AI in homework. Full stop. All "detectors" of AI imo don't really work, can be defeated in various ways, and are in principle doomed to fail. You have to assume that any work done outside classroom has used AI. 2. Therefore, the majority of grading has to shift to in-class work (instead of at-home assignments), in settings where teachers can physically monitor students. The students remain motivated to learn how to solve problems without AI because they know they will be evaluated without it in class later. 3. We want students to be able to use AI, it is here to stay and it is extremely powerful, but we also don't want students to be naked in the world without it. Using the calculator as an example of a historically disruptive technology, school teaches you how to do all the basic math & arithmetic so that you can in principle do it by hand, even if calculators are pervasive and greatly speed up work in practical settings. In addition, you understand what it's doing for you, so should it give you a wrong answer (e.g. you mistyped "prompt"), you should be able to notice it, gut check it, verify it in some other way, etc. The verification ability is especially important in the case of AI, which is presently a lot more fallible in a great variety of ways compared to calculators. 4. A lot of the evaluation settings remain at teacher's discretion and involve a creative design space of no tools, cheatsheets, open book, provided AI responses, direct internet/AI access, etc. TLDR the goal is that the students are proficient in the use of AI, but can also exist without it, and imo the only way to get there is to flip classes around and move the majority of testing to in class settings.

921

16K

2K

8K

3M

Bayazid Malikov 🤖

@b4y4zid

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users