@Jousefm2 My understanding is that this code is actually unable to predict aerodynamics accurately at any meaningful Reynolds number. This is an extraordinary waste of electricity.
@ProjectPhysX @NVIDIADC Dude you could spend your clearly exceptional skills making this code engineering capable but instead you post unresolved misleading eye candy. Why? Why not try and beat out powerflow? Why this?
@CadenceCFD@jchawner 'physically realistic' sure leaves a lot of wiggle room with respect to actual aero loading. Curious what the actual predictive capability is.
@koleross On the spectrum of financial obscenities in this country this is pretty low on the scale man. Run on bank, FDIC stops it, bank dissolves and shareholders lose everything. Accounts moved to larger bank and 1000s of companies can access their own deposits.
@xiaopingqiu @chenna1985 "A blended central-upwind scheme for convection is also available in OpenFOAM
but all computations in this work were stable with the purely central scheme".
You're correct, I had missread that appreciate it.
@chenna1985 You can't be one foot in one foot out for these sorts of peer reviewed analyses. You can't assume that the reader will contextualize the 'end-user experience' when reading this 5 years from now.