ANNOUNCEMENT: @HashCloakLabs is not @hashcloak.
It's an impersonator.
@hashcloak is a consulting company and under NO circumstances will we be launching a coin.
Anyone who knows me knows that I'm pretty generally anti-shitcoin (with nuances of course).
If you bought a token supposedly associated with hashcloak, you've been scammed.
I logged into a client’s LinkedIn account and found something surprising.
Hundreds of connection requests sitting untouched and a few dozen DMs from prospects expressing interest.
Reminder to not get lazy with the basics!
I hate asking for money. But that’s how the system works.
Legal defense isn’t free, and I need the community’s help to keep fighting.
Please donate, share, or retweet → https://t.co/lx9E4ILDrn
Until this case is dismissed, building DeFi - protocols, UIs, tooling carries real legal risk for everyone in this space. The outcome here affects all of us.
Yes.
Otherwise, it will never be a good time and you will forever push it off.
That being said, do your research first before getting a pet. To them, you are a part of their entire lives. To you, they are in your life for a short while (assuming average human lifespans). So, it's not something to take lightly.
@CupOJoseph Skill issue.
In the beginning, sure, the CEO should do approvals but after a while, that should move under the purview of the marketing team and someone from that team should be reporting back to the CEO.
Secret sharing doesn't mean keeping secrets.
It means splitting them — so no single party ever holds enough information to reconstruct the input alone.
This is the foundation of how MPC works. Each party receives a share. Shares are meaningless in isolation. The computation runs across all parties simultaneously, and the result emerges without any node ever seeing the raw data.
No trust required. No single point of failure. No exposure window.
Check out how it works→
https://t.co/94D8G5nzBi
@MCovBrown Did they recently change this?
LinkedIn also deboosted your post if you have links in the main post which is why you saw a lot of "check the comments for the link" style CTAs.
With AI tools, so many people have been literally rolling their own crypto, trying to rewrite basic chat apps...
If this isn't a signal that normies want more privacy then I don't know what is
@jeftovic Lol, we are Canadians.
In reality, Netflix will just increase the subscriptions and we will gladly pay it just like we overpay for everything else 🤣
🚨 Grindr allegedly targeted in breach exposing massive 15M+ users
A threat actor on an underground forum is claiming to sell a complete user database allegedly originating from Grindr, the LGBTQ+ dating and social networking app. The actor says the data includes personal registration information.
The actor claims the database contains over 15M user records with highly sensitive personal data.
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱:
• Usernames, display names, first and last names
• Email addresses (and verification status)
• Password hashes and OAuth subject hashes
• Phone hashes and OAuth provider data
• Gender and sexual orientation
• Dates of birth
• City, country, and precise geolocation (latitude/longitude)
• Physical attributes (height, weight, body type, ethnicity, tribe, position)
• HIV status and last-tested data
• Signup IPs, device type, user agent, and locale
• Account status, premium plan, and activity data
𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀:
𝗧𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁: Grindr
𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿: Technology / Social Networking
𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿: nilojeda
𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺: Complete user database for sale
𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲: 15M+ records
𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲: $400 (LTC, ETH, USDC, USDT)
𝗢𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱: June 2, 2026
💥 Stop guessing what's redacted. Paid subscribers see everything: https://t.co/281Qjc6p2J
Still storing behavioral data in a third-party pipeline?
When raw data has to exist somewhere to be processed, that somewhere is the exposure. MPC removes the requirement entirely — computation happens across distributed parties, and no single node ever sees the input.
Security guarantees are mathematical. Not contractual.
https://t.co/QTUaulggbm
This exact sentiment is what I noticed years ago when hiring interns. major reason why I kind of just stopped hiring interns.
Very few people nowadays have an interest in software engineering and learning things beyond the basics.
They like the signalling attached to working in tech but not the work
By the way, all I really look for are people who understand their tools. I want people who like computers and have the curiosity to get to know the tools they use, so they can be a little more effective on the job. A hint of passion for the work, revealed by expertise.
But I talk to tons of candidates who have no interest in computers and feels like they somehow got memed into SWE cause it's the next doctor/lawyer/whatever.
And I'm talking to mostly senior candidates -- can you imagine working in a stack for five, ten years and never really taking the time to understand what's going on? always reading the docs, just enough to solve the immediate problem, then instantly forgetting? muddling through with some kind of bare minimum of half-knowledge? Man, this feels bleak
By the way, all I really look for are people who understand their tools. I want people who like computers and have the curiosity to get to know the tools they use, so they can be a little more effective on the job. A hint of passion for the work, revealed by expertise.
But I talk to tons of candidates who have no interest in computers and feels like they somehow got memed into SWE cause it's the next doctor/lawyer/whatever.
And I'm talking to mostly senior candidates -- can you imagine working in a stack for five, ten years and never really taking the time to understand what's going on? always reading the docs, just enough to solve the immediate problem, then instantly forgetting? muddling through with some kind of bare minimum of half-knowledge? Man, this feels bleak