bad_vertex

Made: PsiloSybil, Tokonoma, Anura, making: Innards. No AI

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

Never forget what they did: they put Innards on Steam and let you play the alpha for free. It's the first hyperbolic action game and you should play it, stream it, break it, hate it, beat it, lick it, etc https://t.co/9gYSHLoT40

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@BigSnugALot @MolodyGs we're about to witness a neural connection form in real time

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@sissel022 @IanHVG but i did eat breakfast

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

hire a smarter human and pay them money to fix it. Like we've done this whole time. Do you even hear yourself?

[Jamie Feltham @Hero_Kvatch]

I see the internet is having a completely reasonable reaction to this.

Team couldn't solve the issue they had with the help of a Unity engineer. It's a fix that wouldn't have happened otherwise. What did you want them to do 🤷

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@sissel022 @IanHVG how would you feel if your partner was 99.99% faithful

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@MolodyGs @BigSnugALot that's sweet of you but don't bother, it's not worth your time

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@IanHVG ...soul. Soul is soul. Devs are in a profound relationship with their users, and this is thousandfold for games. You can't have "approximate" integrity, you can't be 99.99% honest. You have to see eye to eye with the people you are selling to. If you lose their trust, it's over.

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@IanHVG ...this thing about "the Unity engineer couldn't even fix it" is just garbage, sorry. It just doesn't work like that. This just speaks very poorly of Unity (which tracks) and it's a shoddy deresponsabilization. Absolutely not. Finally...

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@1techutopiapls @J4GameDev i truly cannot imagine people trusting this level of slop to run on their computers?

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@BigSnugALot yes, I am, I do gamedev as a hobby on my free time. I like to do it. Don't you have any hobbies?

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@SMGamesOne @kevvywevy it's not an "over"reaction, it's just the reaction. Games are made for players, they are who pays for them. If they reacted this way, that is it. Devs should rather think twice before using AI

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@Cerium nobody is winning here, we all lost. What are you talking about?

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@SMGamesOne @kevvywevy the pr statement is wholly unsatisfactory, as I detailed in other replies. Players prefer zero AI usage and they had a right to know beforehand. You don't get to handwave and minimize it with technicalities, esp after sales.

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@Cerium gibberish reply

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@Tom998043947447 @SagelessRanger sceptical is a valid spelling. They're pronounced the same.

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@CHORTCHOMP @TheyCallMeCheng @killercrumpet0 @loudflavor then why didn't they disclose this to players before release? Clearly people who paid in full for the game disagree.

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@BigSnugALot what am I supposed to be looking at

[bad_vertex @BadVertexDev]

@IanHVG 1. generative is a very specific technical term. Unfortunately, no leeway here.

2. code is art. Not everyone has this clear, but most players do. So the soul is gone. Integrity is a very fragile thing.