@PolySapiens @MEXC_Official @edgeX_exchange Appreciate it.
These cases need open discussion - market anomalies and silent bans should never become normal.
@Maxxxorre@edgeX_exchange Same here - I was affected by the CRCL event, received bans for raising questions, and official edgeX accounts never provided a technical explanation.
@PolySapiens @MEXC_Official @edgeX_exchange That CRCL sequence matches what I documented in real time - including funding inversion, spread expansion, and disappearing discussion.
@CallumOnCrypto Real user here.
CRCL on March 4โ5 turned a +$1,400 unrealized long into a realized loss after funding flipped and liquidity disappeared.
@NadinOnChain@CallumOnCrypto On March 4โ5, CRCL on edgeX also took a very unique path: funding turned positive while market logic suggested it should stay negative, and order book depth vanished enough to force long exits at an additional ~3% loss.
@edgeX_KF Could you clarify what happened to CRCL liquidity on March 4โ5, when funding moved opposite to standard perp mechanics and spreads widened enough to turn a +1400usdt unrealized position into a realized loss?
@edgeX_KF@zachxbt@aaalexhl Since you mention clarifying facts - could you explain what caused funding on CRCL, MSTR, and COIN on March 4โ5 to move opposite to normal perp mechanics during the pricing deviation?
@edgeX_TraderX@zachxbt@aaalexhl Transparency is exactly why documented pricing incidents matter.
One edgeX case was recorded step by step - screenshots, timestamps, and admin replies included.
@MessariCrypto@edgeX_exchange One recent pricing / funding incident was documented in detail here - timeline, screenshots, and admin responses included: https://t.co/wbKcTrDQDi