![Haqiqatjou's tweet photo. 🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HUEaM6NW0AAVt30.jpg)
![Haqiqatjou's tweet photo. 🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HUEaLUgXsAAiNU6.jpg)
Olivia
Online
alade kazeem bello
@bakadejare
lovers of ideas, Global peace and love
lagos
Joined December 2011
524 Following
188 Followers
6K Posts
🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)
![Haqiqatjou's tweet photo. 🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HUEaM6OXIAA_Aa-.jpg)
Court Jails Cable Dealer For Selling Counterfeit Coleman Wires
…Says Fake Products Portend Grave Danger To Society
A Magistrate Court sitting in the Ojodu Abiodun Magisterial District of Ogun State has sentenced Samson Okonkwo to jail with hard labour without an option of fine
10 yıllık omuz ağrımın 5 saniyelik video ile çözüleceğini hiç hayal etmemiştim
KGB school 🏫
Putin uses silent signals to communicate with his bodyguards
Who to follow
Mohd Awal Idris-Evuti
@Awevooty
A Poet, Strategist, Lecturer, and an Engineer!
Chinasa Ude Imo
@Ruralist_Health
Global Health Policy Strategist |🎙️Host Bold Conversations on What About Rural Health?™️ Podcast | PhD Candidate @Uchicago | Co-Founder @siedihub | @AyeiAfrica
Jeff Okoroafor
@JeffOkoroafor
Publisher - @OpinionNigeria | Entrepreneur - @SetFron Ltd | Good Governance Advocate | #BringBackOurGirls | YALI Fellow | Winner World Summit Award.
VIDEO: Ola of Lagos tours Femi Adebayo’s new Euphoria 360 hub for movie, music production
Source: X | dammiedammie35
---
Follow us for more breaking news and video content
For more stories: https://t.co/GX9bhs3WZ5
Just when you think you've seen it all. Only in Lagos 😂
Funny things dey happen for this city on a daily.
Of all the thousands of tribes and ethnicities living in South Africa
Only Igbo people were mentioned specifically during their protest
Not Hausa not efik not Yoruba
Only Igbo was written boldly on a banner
Disgraceful people
Kravatın sadece 3 hareketle bağlanabildiğini öğrendiğinde kaç yaşındaydın?
Magic secret 🤫
Don’t Throw Away Your Old Charging Cable! ⚡
“YOU ARE ALL SHAMELESS. YOU ARE DISGRACING US.”
A man has criticised Igbo leaders over the decision to hold Ohanaeze Ndigbo’s 50th anniversary celebration in Lagos, questioning why the event was held in Yorubaland.
He also criticised Abia State Governor Alex Otti, who attended the celebration, arguing that the event could have been held in any of the cities he claims to have transformed in Abia.
“Celebrating Ohanaeze in Yorubaland is the same as Yoruba bringing Afenifere to Aba. You will never see them do such. You can’t shame us. You are shameless yourself,” he said.
As a pilot for 20 years I have questions:
- where are the cabin crew here?
- where are the oxygen masks that automatically drop during a rapid emergency descent?
- how did the Capt manage to open the door while being stabbed?
- Omani pilots were not allowed to fly to Israel, why was he allowed?
- how did the offending pilot get a weapon onboard?
- why has this happened so close to elections?
- how are passengers walking around while apparently in a nosedive?
- who else was injured? Nose dives cause significant g force incidents
- why is there two perfectly positioned people recording the incident and not helping?
- why did a plumber take control and not the 2 pilots onboard who would certainly know when an aircraft was in a nosedive?
- why was the plumber speaking in English to Bibi after the flight
- why was he still in his blood soaked clothes 8 hours after the incident
False Flags have been a very effective mechanism to influence public opinion
Hitler burnt down the Reichstag just before his parliament elections and he won the election…changing the course of history.
A full and independent investigation should be carried out here.
Hopefully independent journalist will be allowed to view this too.
@MarioNawfal It's all ANGLO ZIONIST orchestrated
2006. Tinubu was already bringing Chinese investment into Lagos and laying the foundation for what would become the Lekki Free Zone.
Today, it’s part of one of Nigeria’s biggest industrial and investment corridors.
Meanwhile, Peter Obi’s supporters will tell you he was busy building a brewery in Anambra so his people could become more intelligent. 😂😂
Different visions, different legacies.
Germany Builds LEGO Houses in Just 3 Days—No Nails, No Mortar
IDF soldiers beat up Christians during funeral of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh
She’s a Palestinian Christian killed by Israel.
They literally destroyed her casket live on TV.
Can we Ever Call them Normal human being
https://t.co/Tr8OX8Jain
Israeli soldiers shooting a Palestinian father trying to save his kid.
They murdered them both while laughing.
How long these atrocities will continue,
When and who will be the savior who will Stop and Eliminate this Barbarism once and for all.?
Araba viteslerini nasıl kullanacağını öğren.
Just imagine for a moment if the Iranian president stood up at the UN, imagine if Ahmadinejad had come to the UNGA, and said: “Do I annihilate the Jewish state, and do it quickly? Do I drive Israel into hell?”
Imagine the Western and global and media response and outcry.
Omoh! Na the wahala wey Burna Boy go dey face with him $9m Bugatti be this o! 😩
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
analcı
Seen from Turkey
dayanamazsın
Seen from Turkey
علي الملك
Seen from Germany
Kevin Cruz
Seen from Algeria
สาวแว่นขี้เงี่ยน แอบผัวมานัดเย็ด
Seen from Thailand
HotWife CDMX 🇲🇽
Seen from Mexico
Tu 
Seen from Korea
sadece türban
🔥Confessions et partages sexuels en France🔥
Seen from France
Couple mamun sopna
Seen from Turkey
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.9M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers
✨
⭐
💫