$CCLFX charges 1% to own funds that charge 1.5% + 17.5% incentive fees over 6% (Blue Owl). On assets marked by the people collecting those fees just like they do. I am ignoring expense fees.
I am happy to be corrected... if I should be corrected. I am in search the truth and TRANSPARENCY. That is an easily defensible statement as much that I've said is.
Just wait to see everything sourced, cited, justified. I am pushing back on private market assumptions and they are not used to that. I am. I can handle it.
This is spot on. The current narrative is being driven by 1) the media and 2) grifters.
1) the media probably doesnt understand the asset class well enough
2) the grifters understand the asset class, but looking to drive panic selling so they can buy for cheap.
Separately, a lot of zombie Distressed credit fund managers coming out of the woodwork to roast PC. PC guys should ask them to post their returns for the last 10 years before casting stones at another asset classes.
Best leading indicator of Private Credit fund performance will actually be talent turnover at the mid and senior level. These guys comp is largely carry driven. If they start to see underperformance, they’ll jump ship.
One bad loan in a fund could wipe out the fund carry
In like 4 years, we went from everyone buying pictures of monkeys for $1mm to everyone arguing whether Private Credit loans should be marked at 95 vs 99. Investing is crazy.