@USGrant1227 @SonOfVaivasvata But more than that, he knew he had kicked off a cycle of violence that would consume his home as well. And Agamemnon's fate proves him right. He didn't want to go back because he knew what he would find. His home engulfed in violence. Because "we broke the fragile bonds..."
@ult_phil@gabriel_zucman Because if the wealth of the extremely rich generates returns faster than the economy grows, their share of total assets grows exponentially. This makes it harder for the working class (lower wages, can't afford homes). This hurts demand and supresses overall economic growth
@poetential@gabriel_zucman Private/Public company shares and liquid assets are 97% of billionaire wealth. Billionaires will be required to declare the other 3% (most of which is real estate). They can lie if they want, but most won't because not worth the risk. State will audit a few.
@1dad2lads@KyleJones195710@gabriel_zucman@halsinger Private/Public company shares and liquid assets are 97% of billionaire wealth. Billionaires will be required to declare the other 3% (most of which is real estate). They can lie if they want, but most won't because not worth the risk. State will audit a few.
@DoomerTapes@Harrison_wells7 No, it is based on the reasonable person or reasonable officer test. No reasonable officer would view a man being held down face towards the ground as a threat
@realjoshuareid He was shot in the back while being held on the ground. These things are judged by the totality of the situation. Those two facts swamp everything you said. No "reasonable" officer could view a man being held down on his stomach as a threat
@CheeseKees@Mplic1t@Rightanglenews Sure plenty of blame to go around but he shot a man in the back that he could clearly see was being held on the ground. We trust officers to be the people in our society allowed to use violence. With great power comes great responsibility
@Mplic1t@Rightanglenews No "reasonable" agent would fear for his life from a man who was being restrained on the ground with empty hands visible. One of the best clues is that they shot him in the back. Idk about you, but I'd find it pretty hard to shoot someone behind me. Especially while held down
@RussLatino@IamMrsErris They shot him in the back with his empty hands visible. How is it remotely possible that a "reasonable" officer would view him as a threat regardless of if someone is screaming gun
@RussLatino@Tabahnator@carson_blah Even the first shove the officer gives Pretti appears that it would normally constitute assault and excesive force. The officer never even gave a verbal command
@BohannanIowa As I look at this comment section I just keep reminding myself: "Twitter is not real life. Twitter is not real life. Most people aren't a-holes. Twitter is not real life."