@Jjzcol2@Lord_Osiron@HyperboreaSlav China? Japan? South Korea? All 'pagan' (as in non-Abrahamic) technically. And if you excluded them because they dont 'believe' in the divine aspect literally, that itself is an Abrahamic concept. Paganism requires rightful honorable behavior, not necessarily belief.
@Eriuland Current scientific consensus on the homeland of the indo-europeans is in Eastern Europe, not Asia. This guy is either not up to date or deliberately spreading lies. Both cases, pathetic excuse for a human being
@JC1010679150091@HumbleChud@asukagrypr ok good luck convincing everybody with ur really strong will buddy. No words allowed. Whether you like it or not, the human mind is geared for story telling. People see themselves as a part of a larger generational narrative. If you are serious, you are simply retarded.
@HumbleChud@asukagrypr any European country has 100x stronger narrative for expelling foreigners than the settler colonies do, from an American. You guys are literally native to the land. If you guys can't do it no one can. I hope I am wrong
@Anti_fash_Annie@MegaChudette@RupertLowe10@lewisrholmes Traits may appear in all populations, but distribution isnโt uniform between groups. Obviously being the same species, we have more in common than in differences. Call it 'race' or 'ancestry', whatever. My point is 'skin deep' is intellectually dishonest. Just buzz words.
@Anti_fash_Annie@MegaChudette@RupertLowe10@lewisrholmes Incorrect. The concept of races broadened during the Age of Exploration, but it has always been around. 'skin deep' does not hold up either. iq, bone structure, susceptibility to certain medical conditions, incompatible bone marrow etc all genetically different among the races
@JacobDCross1@LadyLoveLDN@glissmeister@identity_pol maga ๐๐ maga is dogshit. and sure in your fairy tail land poor white rapists were protected by the rich and ejected en masse to go on to create the richest countries in the world. doesnt that make the noble savages a little more pathetic if anything?? strange worldview.
@Mitchel73161374@antipodean_man 'On Genetic Interests' by Frank Salter is a good book about why diversity is negative at a societial scale due to evolutionary psychology. If you were genuinely wanting academic defense of anti-immigrant policy and not just talking shit
@Kaykaye38431594@crusade_enjoyer Asian is not a race. There are mongoloids and caucasoids. Technically Indians and Arabs are caucasoids and east Asians are mongoloids but they are all from Asian and therefore Asian.
@70sCoolman@MartinSellner_ not the right skin color for what? can't someone be proud of what their own ancestors did? or do Europeans have to acknowledge everybody on Earth who ever did anything before themselves because of inherited guilt?
@tremtlert@DorotheaBlevi11@visegrad24 why does somebody 'have' to get these immigrants?? it is 100% a choice. look at Japan and South Korea. low immigrants, developed countries, cheap housing. dealing with labor shortages? yes. but so are western countries and we have taken millions of immigrants.
@Svalbard0@Ramos__200@Zygomatic03@chaotichermes Yeah, they must have booked it before the new law. Or they qualify under the new rules. Lucky. It is being challenged in the courts so maybe it will be undone
@EasyVerdict@amba_newsline Not the same. The equivalent to that is if Jamaica conquered Britain before it was a nation, when it was a cluster of tribes, and sent settlers and built cities and civilization there. What she is is an economic migrant in an existing civilization not a settler colonialist.