@timgill924 Why is your instinct to call out a bit of questionable-taste self promotion, and not the *actual* serious misconduct that he exposed? This kind of knee jerk response is exactly how pockets of bad practice survive in academia
@derrrrppoi73207@seraphya@PhilWMagness@larisimilitude@UT_Dallas Are you genuinely stupid? A CV that you write in 2017 and gets online somehow, and then you don't update for a decade, is not "current". It reflects how you were presenting yourself a decade ago, not now. Do you understand how time works?
@derrrrppoi73207@seraphya@PhilWMagness@larisimilitude@UT_Dallas Well I don't have it. And neither do you. It may not even exist. I don't update my CV unless I'm applying for jobs. And the CV being shared here only goes to 2017. If you want to show that to be wrong, *you* have to produce a CV that continues beyond that.
@derrrrppoi73207@seraphya@PhilWMagness@larisimilitude@UT_Dallas It's not her current CV, it only goes up to 2017. She obviously hasn't updated it since she got her current job. I agree that she isn't engaging in this thread in good faith but that doesn't prove the old CV is a misrepresentation
@derrrrppoi73207@seraphya@PhilWMagness@larisimilitude@UT_Dallas The CV is from 2016/17, when the articles presumably were under review. They were then rejected and never appeared. The faculty website just pulled the data automatically from her CV when she was hired. So she never misled (even if she is apparently unproductive, research-wise)
@seraphya@PhilWMagness@larisimilitude@derrrrppoi73207@UT_Dallas Yes it's weird to get a job on the back of 2 under review pieces that clearly were eventually rejected and then never publish anything else. That speaks to a poor track record. But it isn't misrepresentation.
@PhilWMagness@larisimilitude@derrrrppoi73207@UT_Dallas There's a separate question about how someone gets a permanent job on the back of 2 under review pieces that never appear, and then never publishes anything else. But that's on the hiring committee as much as anything.
@PhilWMagness@larisimilitude@derrrrppoi73207@UT_Dallas It is entirely normal to list works "under review" on a CV under the publication heading. They are clearly being presented as provisional and not accepted/published. That isn't the issue.