How many technologies are stuck in a local optima?
Big loudspeakers basically peaked in the 1970s.
Obviously we’ve gotten somewhat better, but it’s a lot closer to: “a couple % more accurate” than “the average person immediately notices the +50-year technological progress”
Miniaturization has improved a lot, so has digital signal processing, amplification. But take a high end setup from 50 years ago, sit in the sweet spot at the same volume…it won’t feel radically different.
I’m trying to think of other fields where the underlying principles were so mature that half a century of progress in materials/software/electronics is underwhelming.
Camera Lenses seem like a good candidate. Non-electronic instruments is another; it’s not like cellos have gotten that much better in the last ~300 years.
I'm compiling 60 kloc of C on a Power Macintosh G3. Though to be fair, I'm not using a spinning rust hard drive, I'm using a Compact Flash card I pulled out of an old digital camera.
In my initial run, which processed the first 60,000 rows, I did not find these awards—my hard drive overheated long before I could complete a full pass through the database. In a later run, which I referenced in another post, I did identify two such awards. That discrepancy is a matter of sampling size, not an issue with the query itself.
I’ll now attempt a full run, which should capture the awards you found.
We were rushing through DCA today and I think we saw Mitch McConnell.
By the time it registered and my partner and I shot each other a side eye he was too far gone to fire off a good, "Hey Mitch, fuck you!"
@keysmashbandit@voooooogel 256^2048 is _huge_, but nearly all can be thrown out right away with one line of code. Pre-process with the least strict linter ever. Then it's almost possible
@keysmashbandit@voooooogel Yeah it's computationally expensive enough to require a hydroelectric dam, but at least you don't get a game that changes.. *checks notes* ... when you look at clouds.