It is the El-Sayed/Piker ticket. No need to sugar coat it. El-Sayed stapled himself to bigotry, misogyny and anti-Semitism (and a weird case of anti-Mackinac Island fever.) It is who he is: an anti-American from the fringes of far left politics. The walking, talking Green-Red revolution.
It's not a matter of whether America can produce great Americans, it's whether we have a civic culture that values them, uplifts them, and entrusts them with leadership, or shouts them down as scolds and instead chooses the crude, the selfish, and the corrupt because "they fight."
The Democratic Party has decided to ingest its radical Islamic base wholesale. They’re a key part of the coalition now. The red-green axis is now fully active. And it should scare the s*** out of Americans.
https://t.co/3WTSzLsOLF
@TheJamesCrane@TheCalvinCooli1 You keep proving my point. Blaming the “Joos” and a country that is the U.S. strongest ally and only democracy in the Middle East.
Iron Dome is purely defensive and protects thousands of *Americans* in Israel from terrorist attacks targeting civilians. And he doesn’t obsess over our support for other allied militaries. Gosh, I wonder why.
I try to stay apolitical in my profession of war studies, I really do, but the anti-Israeli grift in American politics is sick. Even if you don't care about Israel. Have no clue about the benefits of the Israel-American relationship (there are many). Hate to hate. To see political candidates make anti-Israel one of their primary political positions, in the United States, and get votes for that, to play on ignorance about Israel, the region, the different fronts rather than real domestic issues like economy, safety, opportunity or foreign policy issues like great power competition, terrorism, energy, national security, waste/fraud/abuse in the international institutions. Rather, to play on clickbait lies rather than hard truths. It is sick and continues to put American jewish citizens, communities in danger.
It's... right there in the column. The electoral college for starters, and most Democrats either want to expand the Supreme Court, or in the case of El-Sayed, imposing term limits on Supreme Court justices and allow each presidential term the same number of Supreme Court appointments. Separate from the Constitution, he wants to abolish the filibuster, ICE and private health insurance.
The Democratic Socialists of America platform calls to abolish the U.S. Senate and “replace the President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.”
This process only works if you read what what I write. I can't read it for you.
Socialism isn't just a bogeyman word for things that "code left." It's an actual approach to government chiefly defined by central economic control and government stewardship of people's lives. And that's not simply a question of left or right. It's a question of whether the government is constrained as a protector of liberty and it's leaders understand themselves to be stewards of a free nation. An administration and a party promising to "protect us from socialism" that nevertheless engages in all the hallmarks of socialism and doesn't constrain its governing vision in limited government and decentralized authority is not one that offers much comfort in a time of rising socialism in the other party.
Why does Jon Stewart say “the people who define those things” have called the war Hamas started a genocide?
The International Court of Justice has made no such ruling.
Why lie? Do you want Palestinians to have suffered a genocide?
No, it means @AIPAC will oppose a candidate who, with good reason, they believe is anti-Israel. Which is what an organization dedicated to strengthening the American/Israeli relationship should do, right? Or @PeterBeinart, would you prefer AIPAC go against its mission and instead SUPPORT candidates who are anti-Israel? Then should unions support candidates who are anti-labor? And should environmental lobbying groups support candidates who believe climate change is a hoax? Do you see how silly you sound?
The Constitution does NOT give you rights. You already have them.
The Constitution simply tells the government that it cannot take those s rights away.
I wish more people understood this.
.@DavidAFrench and I are headed across the country via train! We have a sleeper car for our two day journey and lots of books for this trip celebrating our thirtieth anniversary. 💕❤️🇺🇸🚂🚞🚊