Karlyn Bryant

cancer survivor

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@PracticeItAgain Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@Kingwoman Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@rockquarry44 Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@Nallysmom Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@JTrainHODL Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@Behm7Janet Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@scott_boyette Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[Karlyn Bryant @bbuseshn]

@rebekah930 Dr. William Makis gave me real hope when I had stage 4 lung cancer and felt out of options. His protocol (Ivermectin + Mebendazole) changed everything. You might be fortunate enough to get a reply just as I have
Contact:[email protected]

[no.mind @the_no_mind]

You are probably drinking too much water.

Dr. Laszlo Boros strongly warns against drinking water habitually or in large quantities without the natural cue of thirst.

This directly contradicts much of the conventional hydration advice that encourages people to drink three liters of water per day, a gallon per day, or hit a predetermined hydration target.

He considers environmental water one of the sneakiest sources of deuterium because it enters the body directly.

Unlike food, it arrives without carbon.

It absorbs into tissues and mixes directly with your cytoplasmic water.

This matters because the body is already designed to produce its own deuterium-depleted water.

Every day.

As mitochondria combine protons with oxygen, they create metabolic water inside the mitochondrial matrix.

According to Dr. Laszlo Boros — Hungarian medical biochemist, retired professor at UCLA School of Medicine, author of 100+ peer-reviewed papers and one of the world's leading deuterium researchers — this is the most important water in the body.

And the amount of metabolic water you produce depends heavily on the fuel you burn.

Approximately 100 grams of fat generate around 110 grams of metabolic water.

100 grams of carbohydrates produce only around 55 grams.

Nearly half as much.

Fat produces substantially more metabolic water per unit of food consumed.

This is one reason Boros spends so much time discussing fat metabolism and follows a carnivore ketogenic diet himself.

Excessive water intake creates a different problem.

According to Boros, drinking too much water — especially without salt — lowers blood osmolarity, which causes the brain to swell.

The pituitary gland sits inside a tight bony compartment at the base of the skull called the sella turcica.

When the brain swells from excess water, it physically compresses the pituitary gland inside this rigid bone.

That can shut down its ability to release crucial hormones.

Because the pituitary regulates sex hormones, fertility hormones, and thyroid-stimulating hormones, overdrinking can disrupt the entire endocrine system and contribute to chronic conditions like infertility and autoimmune thyroid issues.

The most critical hormone affected is antidiuretic hormone (ADH), also called vasopressin.

ADH normally signals the kidneys to reabsorb and preserve the body's own deuterium-depleted metabolic water.

Without ADH, your body cannot hold onto its clean water.

Boros points out that if you drink a liter of water in 30 minutes, you will simply pee it right back out.

Because people constantly suppress ADH by forcing themselves to drink water, Boros notes that the average American has an ADH level of about 0.6, compared to a normal level of 1.0.

In his view, the general population has essentially given itself a water-wasting disease called diabetes insipidus.

Diabetes insipidus is a condition where the body cannot properly balance fluid levels, leading to excessive production of large volumes of urine and intense thirst.

The downstream consequence is not just water loss.

The suppression of these metabolic regulators can contribute to the buildup of visceral and subcutaneous fat.

To show how dangerous overriding thirst can become, Boros gives an extreme example.

A mother in New Jersey took her kids on a mountain walk and drank approximately 1.5 liters of water in 15 minutes.

The rapid water influx caused severe brain swelling.

By the time she drove back to her garage, she fell into a coma and died.

Extreme case.

But the principle is clear.

More water is not always better.

Now, the natural objection arises:

"What about the studies showing performance drops before thirst kicks in? You can't rely on thirst — it lags behind the actual need."

Boros addresses this directly.

His argument:

Those studies were almost certainly run on subjects whose ADH system was already suppressed from years of chronic overdrinking.

If you have spent years forcing yourself to drink 3-4 liters a day whether thirsty or not, you have gradually damaged your hypothalamic cells' ability to produce ADH.

It takes approximately six months of gradually reducing water intake to restore ADH production to normal levels.

A subject with suppressed ADH entering a dehydration study will show impaired performance before thirst — not because thirst lags, but because their thirst signal itself is broken.

They lost the ability to produce sufficient ADH — the key hormone in the hypothalamic system that drives both water retention and thirst signaling.

Prime the subjects correctly — gradually restore their ADH production before the study begins — and Boros argues you would see a completely different result.

The studies are not wrong.

They are measuring the wrong population.

Boros does not see a reason to drink water when you are not thirsty.

Thirst is the signal.

It tells you when to drink.

It also tells you when to stop.

His argument is not that people should restrict water.

His argument is that people should stop overriding the signals that evolved to regulate it.

This is an important distinction.

Boros is not saying: Don't drink water.

He is saying: Drink when thirsty. Drink enough. Then stop.

Even Dr. Gabor Somlyai's deuterium-depleted water protocols in his book "Deuterium Depletion" recommend around 1.5–2 liters per day.

Not a gallon per day.

Not constant hydration.

This is the researcher who has followed 2,649 cancer patients over 32 years and whose company sells deuterium-depleted water.

If anyone had an incentive to recommend drinking more of it, it would be him.

Yet his protocols still recommend around 1.5–2 liters per day.

Thirst is a precise physiological signal.

Just like hunger.

Like sleepiness.

You don't go to sleep just because a bed is in the room.

The body already knows when it needs water.

The problem begins when we stop listening.

[Dr. Zakaria MD @ZakariaMDv3]

Please share and quote.

🚨🚨 REMEMBER: Receiving chemotherapy against cancer also eliminates your NK cells and your T cells. And the only thing that protects your body against cancer is your lymphocytes; the NK cells and the T cells...
Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, oncology expert.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

There Are No Cases Of Autism In The Unvaccinated Amish Community.

You won't find Kids with ADD, Autoimmune Disease, PANDAS, PANS or Epilepsy.

There is no Cancer, Diabetes or Asthma.

The US government has studied the Amish for decades but has never released its findings to the public.

The reason is that the report would show that NOT following government health guidelines leads to BETTER health — devastating the official narrative and exposing how the CDC has harmed Americans while burying contradictory data for decades.

Steve Kirsch testified before the Pennsylvania Senate, with findings by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF).

“All these vaccines are causing harm to our kids. It’s not just the COVID vaccines,” attested Steve Kirsch.

“If you compare the results of kids whose moms didn’t get vaccinated, no Vitamin K shot & no vaccines, and if you compare the outcomes of those kids versus kids who got the CDC schedule, there is a dramatic difference,” he emphasized.

The prevalence of Autism in the United States has increase from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 31.

“It is a difference that nobody wants to talk about ... The fully unvaccinated kids are always healthier.”

The Control Group Data, as presented by Dr. Paul Thomas.

Condition -- Vaccinated / Unvaccinated:

• All Chronic Conditions -- 60% / 5.71%
• Arthritis -- 16.67% / 0%
• Heart Disease -- 48% / 0%
• Diabetes -- 10% / 0%
• Asthma -- 7.7% / 0%
• Autism -- 2.5% / 0%
• ADHD -- 9.4% / 0.47%
• Cancer -- 6.0% / 0%

The Amish communities are the perfect placebo control group. They live their lives close to nature, outdoors & in the sun, they eat whole single ingredient foods without chemicals, they reject government overreach & have robust immune systems by avoiding harmful vaccines.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

🚨The largest observational human ivermectin cancer study ever conducted is now peer-reviewed and published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research. 84.4% of cancer patients reported complete remission, tumor shrinkage, or halted tumor growth.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

ALARMING HISTORICAL WARNING:

In 1909, Dr. W.B. Clark reported in the New York Press:

“Cancer was practically unknown until cowpox vaccination began to be introduced (in 1853). I have had to deal with 200 cases of cancer and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

Cancer was a rarity more than 250 years ago.

Then came mass vaccination programs.

Today? Cancer is a global epidemic — striking younger and younger people, with rates exploding across every age group.

Coincidence? Or the predictable result of injecting foreign material into the human body for generations?

They told us it was “safe and effective.”
History — and this doctor who actually treated the cases — tells a very different story.

Question everything.
Your life and your children’s lives may depend on it.

What exactly is being injected?? Glad you asked...

Polysorbate 80, Aluminum, Formaldehyde, MF59 Squalene, Acetone, Borax, 2-Phenoxyethanol, SV40 Cancer promoter, Triton X-100, Bovine/Poultry Byproducts, Neomycin, Hamster/Monkey/Dog/Human Cells, Live Viruses, E. Coli, Tetanus Toxoid & more.

[Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub @Ivermectinkart]

Everything That Cancer Likes...Parasites Like. Everything Cancer Hates...Parasites Hate."

"Everything Fits When You Start Looking At It Correctly. Parasitic Drugs Treat Cancer...Because Cancer Is Parasites."
Dr Lee Merritt, MD

"We Get Sick From Radiation, Poison & Parasites."

"Antiparasitic drugs & herbs are being used around the world to combat & cure all types of cancers. Why does that work? Because most of them are parasites."

"If knowing they are parasites & easily treated, no one would be pressured to do toxic chemotherapy & radiation in cancer treatment centers."

"If the Oncologists are not taught to look for parasites as the cause or that the cancerous tumor or mass is actually parasitic eggs sacs...If you never got that training you wouldn't even know that was a possibility."

"If Oncologists never acknowledge this, you would never know there are cheap alternatives to kill parasites & remove them from the human body, all naturally even, versus having to use chemotherapy & radiation to try to kill ALL CELLS in the human body hoping you don't kill the person."

Common Parasites & What Organs They Inhabit:

Schistosomiasis (Blood Fluke)...reside in the bladder.

Opisthorchis viverrini & Clonorchis sinensis (Liver Flukes)...reside in the liver & bile ducts.

Toxoplasmosis...causes ocular tumors, meningioma, leukemia & lymphomas.

Cryptosporidium parvum...reside in the digestive tract, mainly colorectal.

Trichomonas Vaginalis...resides in the cervix & prostate.

A Parasite protocol is important & also heavy metal detox simultaneously because parasites are attracted to a host with heavy metal toxicity.

Also important is eliminating the parasites fuel source, which is sugar. A low carbohydrate animal based diet devoid of glucose, sucrose & fructose...starves the parasites of their preferred fuel.

[Redacted @RedactedNews]

🚨 Cancer rates are exploding, and Dr. Paul Marik says four epidemiological studies now point to a stunning rise since the COVID mRNA rollout. Big Pharma does not want that question asked. @DrPaulMarik1 puts the cancer industry on notice.

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippen]

BOOM.

This is exactly why Big Pharma and the NCI buried it.

They’re about to lose billions.

Ivermectin & Mebendazole are curing cancer — something chemotherapy could never do. Nearly 200 patients. Multiple cancer types. 84% positive outcomes.

[Dr. Zakaria MD @ZakariaMDv3]

IVERMECTIN and MEBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 75 year old patient with Breast cancer 10 years ago, has 5 new breast masses. They almost completely disappear after 4 months on protocol!
Some of the results I get are absolutely jaw dropping.
This one is a "must see".
STORY:
75 year old patient had breast cancer 10 years ago
recently developed multiple breast masses and neck lymph nodes up to 3.6cm.
"I do not wish to be treated by the traditional medical system, after a past breast cancer episode and also learning from the COVID pandemic"
Fair enough.
We started a protocol in October 2024:
Ivermectin 1mg/kg/day
Mebendazole 1000mg/day
RESULTS after 4 months on the Makis Ivermectin Cancer Clinic Protocol:
Patient: "The comparison is almost unbelievable!"
1.6cm right breast lesion - gone
1.2cm right breast lesion - now 0.9cm
3.6x2.9cm left breast lesion, possible intramammary lymph node - gone
1.7cm left breast lesion - gone
2.9x2.3cm left breast lesion - gone
Patient: "in addition to these breast
improvements, five big lumps in my neck have disappeared!"
No biopsy. No surgery. No chemo. No radiation.
No other explanation.
These breast masses weren't that small either!
When I post these testimonials and the patient also took chemo, many people like to claim the chemo did all the work (and Ivermectin doesn't work).
There was no chemo in this case. No radiation. No other treatment of any kind.
Many of you have been asking if Ivermectin and Mebendazole work without chemo.
Here is your answer😃

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippen]

1. "Ivermectin: A Supercharged Cancer Fighter"

Ivermectin is proving to be up to 7 times more effective than conventional treatments in disrupting cancer’s survival mechanisms. With just a single dose, it strikes cancer cells through multiple pathways and helps block the formation of new tumors, both at the original site and in areas where cancer might spread.

#Fenbendazole
#Ivermectin
#Cancercure

[Didi @lilfairydidi]

6 years cancer free btw

[PharmacyinUSA @pharmacyinusa]

🚨 THIS WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO BE A CANCER DRUG

Fenbendazole was developed to treat parasites.

Not cancer.

Which is why researchers were surprised enough to publish a case series describing three patients whose cancers reportedly went into remission after using it.

Cancer survives by dividing over and over again. Fenbendazole appears to interfere with microtubules, structures cells need to complete that process.

The paper doesn't claim fenbendazole is a cure.

But it does explain why this decades-old antiparasitic keeps showing up in cancer discussions around the world.

And once people start reading the studies for themselves, the next question usually isn't "Does this exist?"

It's "Where can I get it?"

That's why thousands turn to @PharmacyinUSA for fenbendazole, ivermectin, and other repurposed medicines.