Benton OR 4 EI

Advancing election integrity. Championing transparency and fairness. Empowering communities to ensure every vote counts. [email protected]

[F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli @USAttyEssayli]

If you have witnessed potential election fraud, we want to hear from you.

People have been contacting our office wanting to provide information. We have established a dedicated email address for this purpose.

Email tips to: [email protected]

Please do not send rumors, theories, or second-hand information. We require direct evidence. Examples of what to report:

• A ballot arrived at your home for someone who has never lived there.

• You were told someone already voted in your name.

• You witnessed someone filling out ballots for others without their knowledge.

[Susan Shelley @Susan_Shelley]

Ballotpedia reports that 36 states in the U.S. require some form of voter ID. (Not California, Illinois or New York.)
https://t.co/hORaMt6hsw

[Susan Shelley @Susan_Shelley]

Really, all you have to know about elections in California is that when voters in the city of Huntington Beach passed a charter amendment to enable the city to require voter ID in local elections, the state sued to block it and then passed a state law prohibiting voter ID.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says CALIFORNIA IS CHEATING and demands the SAVE AMERICA ACT

“It's 4 DAYS and they still aren't even close to telling you who won. You know why? Because they're RIGGING the election!” 💯

"We should pass the SAVE America Act!"

It’s worse than a 3rd world country!

[AAGHarmeetDhillon @AAGDhillon]

Teamwork/dreamwork.

Ask yourselves — why does California (& many other states) hide their voter rolls from the federal government at the same time they gladly hand them over to liberal activist groups?!

🧐hmmm

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

🚨 NOW: An Assistant US Attorney is now INSIDE the Los Angeles ballot processing center, as @USAttyEssayli announces MULTIPLE federal investigations into voter fraud in California

Expose it ALL and prosecute!

[Conservative Brief @ConservBrief]

The Fix is In?!

BREAKING NEWS out of California - massive ballot drop in Los Angeles mayoral race saw Republican Spencer Pratt get ZERO votes out of 24,000 ballots delivered. Zero. The odds of that happening are 1 in multiple TRILLIONS, as Democrat Nithya Raman now pulls closer to second place.

[The Gateway Pundit @gatewaypundit]

JUST IN: US Attorney Observes Los Angeles Election Center as Feds Launch Multiple Voter Fraud Investigations (VIDEO)

READ: https://t.co/CtNvZkn9Ja

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

How are Democrats cheating in L.A.?

Let me show you…

There are 26 registered voters at this toilet in Los Angeles.

I’m not kidding. I have the voter records. See for yourself. The only thing here is a stinky port-a john inside an empty parking lot.

No homes. No mailboxes. No businesses. Yet TWENTY SIX ‘people’ are casting ballots here.

Straight-up voter fraud out in the open. This just a glimpse of what’s happening under Gavin Newsom.

This is why California desperately needs Voter ID — and we must pass the Save Act NOW.

[Election Integrity Network @EIwatchdogs]

Why is the SAVE America Act so important?

Recently, EIN President Sharon Bemis and Coalition Director Sara Vieira joined Tea Party Patriots' Jenny Beth Martin to discuss what's really at stake.

The SAVE America Act isn't about politics.

It's about protecting the foundation of representative government by ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in U.S. elections.
Proof of citizenship to register.
Photo ID to vote.
Cleaner voter rolls.

These are common-sense safeguards that Americans overwhelmingly support.

The states are leading the way, but Congress must do its part.

Watch the conversation and learn why the SAVE America Act matters to every state and every citizen.

[Daniel Jeong @DanielJ41413]

[The Geopolitical Frontier: Cyber Security Expert Mark Cook Denounces Police Brutality and "Communist Tactics" in Seoul Ballot Seizure]

What are the systemic and international security warnings issued by global electoral analyst Mark Cook regarding the violent suppression of civilian polling monitors in South Korea?

On June 5, 2026, international cybersecurity and election forensics specialist Mark Cook issued a critical, highly alarming geopolitical assessment on X regarding the escalating administrative and physical violence marring South Korea’s June 3 local elections.

Cook formally amplified direct field intelligence from the Jamsil district in Seoul, where a highly coordinated law enforcement operation executed a forced, early-morning retrieval of physical ballot containers from grassroots civilian defense units.

The expert explicitly linked the localized physical clash to a broader, asymmetric strategy designed to eliminate independent civilian oversight and facilitate the unmonitored, clandestine transportation of voting data to centralized processing hubs.

The core empirical focus of Cook’s international dispatch centered on a severe human rights violation targeted at a young constitutional defender.

Cook documented that a 21-year-old civilian monitor was violently neutralized and knocked unconscious by law enforcement personnel while actively executing his civic duty to prevent the ballot boxes from being removed for a localized "secret count."

Cook fiercely conceptualized this state-sponsored physical trauma, framing the administrative overreach as a textbook manifestation of totalitarian tactics.

He asserted that utilizing raw physical coercion to suppress independent civilian watchdogs and execute the tactical theft of sovereign ballots is precisely what communist networks deploy when they lack statistical legitimacy but possess localized physical dominance over unorganized populations.

Extending his systemic diagnosis beyond the immediate boundaries of the Korean Peninsula, Mark Cook utilized this crisis as an existential warning directed at the constitutional infrastructure of the United States and the broader Western alliance.

He challenged the psychological complacency of Western electorates, declaring that individuals who believe such brutal, state-sanctioned electoral subversion could not manifest in America very soon are living in a profound fantasy world.

Asserting that the Western democratic model is merely inches away from a similar structural collapse, Cook issued an urgent strategic mandate for constitutional patriots to rapidly build vast, organized defensive networks and coalitions.

Cook's tactical integration with the legal and political movements led by Hwang Kyo-ahn, Leader of the Freedom and Innovation Party, emphasizes that defending the ballot box requires an uncompromised, transnational intelligence and legal defense architecture.

As Mark Cook’s digital warning circulates across global conservative networks to trigger joint international monitoring initiatives, will this explicit documentation of police intervention force Western legislative bodies to reassess the stability of electronic and centralized election models worldwide?

[Joan @HuiJo96872]

@DrFrankModels Korea's voting rights and freedoms are disappearing. Police are suppressing ordinary citizens trying to expose election fraud.
Please pay attention to what’s happening in Korea before our freedom is completely lost.

@POTUS
@elonmusk
@UnderSecPD
@bmarcois
@GordonGChang

[Dr Douglas G Frank @DrFrankModels]

"Election Fraud, Korean Style"

In Jamsil, Korea, only half of the ballots needed were sent to the local polling station. The locals rose up, and refused to release the cast ballots until everyone was given their chance to vote. (I spoke at the large rally/demostration/blockade held there last evening.)

This morning, the police arrived, penetrated the crowd, and retrieved the TWO ballot barrels. A short while later, FOUR ballot barrels were delivered to the central counting facility.

Nothing to see here, folks. Move along...

A 21yr old man was injured during the extraction, and is now in a coma.

[Benton OR 4 EI @BCOR4EI]

Free at last!

[Benton OR 4 EI @BCOR4EI]

📢Calling all Patriots!

[Owen Gregorian @OwenGregorian]

HUGE WIN FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY: Federal Judge SMASHES Desperate Democrat Lawsuit from DNC, Schumer, and Jeffries — Clears Way for Citizenship Checks on Mail-In Ballots | Jim Hᴏft, The Gateway Pundit

A federal judge on Thursday handed President Donald Trump and election integrity advocates a major victory after rejecting Democrats’ desperate attempt to block Trump’s executive order aimed at tightening mail-in voting rules and strengthening citizenship verification for federal elections.

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump-appointed jurist who clearly actually reads the Constitution, slapped down a multi-headed monster of lawsuits filed by the Democratic National Committee, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, and far-left activist groups like the NAACP, Common Cause, and the League of United Latin American Citizens.

The Democrats and their mainstream media allies have been throwing a collective temper tantrum ever since President Trump signed the March 31 Executive Order.

The directive tackles the massive vulnerabilities in our election systems by utilizing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) to build comprehensive state citizenship lists. It also instructs the U.S. Postal Service to ensure mail-in ballots are only delivered to verified, eligible adult citizens.

The order further directs the Attorney General to prioritize prosecutions of anyone sending ballots to ineligible voters and allows for the withholding of federal funds from non-compliant states.

To any sane American, ensuring only citizens vote is common sense. But to the radical left, verifying citizenship is an “unconstitutional nightmare.”

They ran crying to the courts, begging for an immediate preliminary injunction to stop the order before the upcoming midterm elections.

Judge Nichols wasn’t having any of it. In a scathing 26-page opinion, the judge ruled that the Democrats failed to show they have any standing or have suffered a single shred of actual harm.

“Given that the Executive Order does not command Plaintiffs to do anything, and that no agency has yet acted pursuant to the Order in a way that could harm Plaintiffs, they have not suffered any harm at present,” Nichols wrote in his opinion.

The court repeatedly emphasized that the executive order merely directs agencies to begin lawful processes and does not itself remove voters, alter ballots, or force states to take any immediate action.

Nichols also noted that the order explicitly requires all actions to comply with existing federal laws, including the Privacy Act and other legal protections.

The ruling is particularly embarrassing for Democrat organizations that attempted to argue the mere possibility of future voter roll checks constituted “irreparable harm.”

Judge Nichols dismantled many of their arguments, writing that their claims relied on a “highly attenuated chain of possibilities” and speculative fears about what states or federal agencies might do in the future.

The court further rejected claims that organizations had standing simply because they chose to divert resources toward political activism and voter education campaigns in response to Trump’s order.

Citing Supreme Court precedent, Nichols explained that activist groups “cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves based on their fears of hypothetical future harm.”

The decision marks another significant legal win for President Trump as Democrats continue their nationwide campaign against election security measures.

https://t.co/z049v6N84L

[Benton OR 4 EI @BCOR4EI]

📢🇺🇸Come one, come all! Let's celebrate our historic assets!

[Benton OR 4 EI @BCOR4EI]

@WeNeedSteve Almost over the finish line! Go Steve!