Statement on behalf of UEFA and its 55 National AssociationStatement on behalf of UEFA and its 55 National AssociationStatement on behalf of UEFA and its 55 National AssociationStatement on behalf of UEFA and its 55 National Associations
FIFA confirm highly controversial plans to form FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), a new body that would oversee commercial rights and operational delivery. It requires private stakeholders and funding. UEFA are strongly opposed, viewing it as FIFA President Gianni Infantino selling stakes in the game.
It is understood Infantino is in line to be commissioner, likely after his expected election for one more term.
FIFA will seek to raise capital of up to USD 4.2 billion and have approached Josh Kushner's Thrive Capital as one potential key investor.
FIFA say "outside investors will have only a minority stake in FFE and will not play any operational role".
FIFA also argue this is all with the intent of expanding "football development funding to over USD 10 billion", and is subject to approval by the 2011 Member Associations, who will have a period of consultation to discuss plans.
FIFA add they will retain sole control of FFE and "exclusive authority over football governance, competitions, match calendar, and all regulatory and sporting decisions."
In addition, FIFA hope to establish the FIFA Fast Forward Programme (FFFP). Under this plan, all 211 Member Associations will be given the opportunity to participate and "access up to USD 20 million in one-off capital".
J.P. Morgan are working in partnership with FIFA on the project.
UEFA will not support FFE. In a statement they say, "None of us are the owners of football. It is not FIFA’s to sell."
It is not atomic weapons that generate #peace, but disarmament. This truth, which seemed clear in past decades when we witnessed a nuclear de-escalation, has been obscured by a race to armament that today frightens and terrifies.
Mark Rutte is such an embarrassment. As a citizen of a country that is a nato member, the idea that these two guys are the ones we put in charge of our security and safety is absolutely insane.
Trump: "Spain is a wasted cause. We don't want to do any trade business with Spain anymore, by the way. I'd like to cut it off. Spain is a terrible partner in NATO. Cut off all trade with Spain, please. Including visits. We don't want anything to do. They're hopeless. Bad people."
The 100th country joined team #TPNW today. I’m so proud of the campaign and the work it does to get country after country to ban nuclear weapons, it’s more needed than ever. ICAN and TPNW 4-ever!!! 💕💕💕
1/ Remember when we were told a ban on nuclear weapons wouldn't happen? Because the nuclear-armed states would never allow it.
Well today, the #NuclearBan which came into force just over 5 years ago, already has the support of a clear majority of states eligible to join it!
At the NATO summit in Ankara, military spending will increase again. NATO already outspends Russia 10x on nuclear weapons. $89.5bn (US, UK, FR) vs $9.5bn (RU). And yet NATO still feels threatened. If 10x the spending doesn't help, the problem isn't the budget. It's the strategy.
😬📹ICAN’s @MelissaParke01 went live on Al Jazeera from Lake Lucerne ahead of the US–Iran 🇺🇸🇮🇷talks. Then, two minutes in, the Swiss weather launched its own intervention. Wind. Rain. Hail. Umbrellas. Live TV chaos. Gone with the wind, literally. #NuclearBan
However, in diplomacy you sometimes just need to call something a win so if this is what Trump needs to say to end his illegal war on Iran then im not going to protest
It’s also the main commitment that Iran made when signing and ratifying the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. And what it has said publicly over and over again for years and years.
Trump says the most important aspect of the MOU is Iran affirms it will never develop or seek to acquire a nuke. He paints this as his big victory.
Preamble to 2015 JCPOA:
“Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek, develop or acquire any nuclear weapons.”
CORRECTION: Israel plans major settlement push across occupied West Bank https://t.co/1MGC3gNXdo
We will delete a post that referenced Israel’s latest settlement push as being seen by many as illegal; Israel’s settlements in the occupied West Bank are deemed illegal under international law
Headlines are where the mendacity of Western mainstream media really comes through. It suggests that the legal status of Israeli settlements is an open question, open to debate.
In reality, the ICJ 19 July 2024 Advisory Opinion concluded that Israel's occupation of Palestine is unlawful and that the settlements violate international law.
It ruled that Israel must cease settlement activity and evacuate settlers.
The UNGA then endorsed the ICJ ruling on 19 September 2024 (A/RES/ES-10/24).
There is no debate. No open question. The settlements and the occupation are illegal.
For Reuters to pretend otherwise is to directly undermine international law.