@MCantow@Rob_IJ@Sector035 ๐คฃ too many... I ended up with several millions. I hoped that the cabin was present in osm maps. But that did not work.
I was able to minimize the dataset to exclude smaller water bodies. That gave me a few thousand points. In 1 hour I was able to eliminate a few hundred points.
@Rob_IJ@MCantow@Sector035 4) create new points at those line end's
5) create small buffers around the points
6) select every buffer which crosses with a waterbody
7) manual searching those selected waterbodies
@us_ername_@MCantow@dondude Theoretically... Yes it does. Only at some point you have to make estimated guesses with some extra spare space. Which will cause a large list of possible's. That list can grow very hard and can get beyond the aimed effectiveness of this method.
@us_ername_@MCantow@dondude Yes you're correct. You could use different variables with the field calculator and expressions.
Only just like you already mentioned ..... More work. It's a very iteratively job.
Product looks great!!!
@twone2 Found it.
The finding itself was quickly done with overpass. Since you mentioned to search your 'regular' locations.
proofing.... was a bit different :P
But with youtube and google earth an approximate location has been found.