@JudySeeberger@MNAFLCIO@mnnurses What exactly do you expect to accomplish here? Appealing to the mythical moderate voter is a losing proposition, good luck with that.
#Packers fans: it's not happening.
17 teams have more cap space than the Packers.
Four of them could give DK his $30M a year and STILL have more cap space than the Packers.
For a WR when still have Doubs, Reed, and Wicks?
You can get Elijah Moore for a quarter of that.
@clmarohn This is all darkly funny because so many MN cities overbuild their streets with way too much curbside parking for the use, so there’s so much excess capacity. Use the available parking? “No not like that!”
@_Murphy_Dan The core of the issue for me is that the “price” (maiming, death) of screwing up as a pedestrian is extremely high, I don’t think some markings on the ground make people instantly forget that.
@_Murphy_Dan But I do think paint has a much bigger effect on drivers in this regard than on pedestrians. Therefore, I’d say adding crosswalks in more locations doesn’t induce a false sense of safety in pedestrians as much as it would get more compliance from drivers.
"it is comparatively easy to make computers exhibit adult level performance on intelligence tests or playing checkers, and difficult or impossible to give them the skills of a one-year-old when it comes to perception and mobility".
https://t.co/X70RH0t55g
Claude 3 gets ~60% accuracy on GPQA. It's hard for me to understate how hard these questions are—literal PhDs (in different domains from the questions) with access to the internet get 34%.
PhDs *in the same domain* (also with internet access!) get 65% - 75% accuracy.
@slucy@PoliticsAndEd Also, it’s almost always cheaper to build the multiuse path. The extra pavement width used for a bike lane has to be built to the same thickness as the rest of the roadway, to support heavy vehicle traffic. You can get away with far lighter construction with a multiuse trail.