@washingtonpost Invalid research. This recommendation harmed a generation of women in 1950.
Institute for Family Studies (IFS) was established in 2009 to sponsor research and programs that advanced right-of-center perspectives on marriage and family life.
@Heritage Institute for Family Studies (IFS) was established in 2009 to sponsor research and programs that advanced right-of-center perspectives on marriage and family life.
Not valid research behind "success sequence"
@robkhenderson Bad research picked up by other outlets doesn't make it any more valid.
Institute for Family Studies (IFS) was established in 2009 to sponsor research and programs that advanced right-of-center perspectives on marriage and family life.
@TPPF Following this sequence is good for a few. Bad for the many. Especially women.
For rational people.
Institute for Family Studies (IFS) was established in 2009 to sponsor research and programs that advanced right-of-center perspectives on marriage and family life.
@WBJonline@TheEventsDC For the celebration on the White House lawn next July 4, DC movie theaters and popups should play Idiocracy 24/7.
https://t.co/o20sMGkZ6b
Democratic presidents generate 11% more PER YEAR than markets under Republican presidents. It's called the "president puzzle" in economic circles...https://t.co/a2oBYaSBQE
I am a registered independent who takes pride in evaluating each candidate on a per policy basis.
This data shocked me — here are the SPY returns for the first 45 months of the last three Presidents tenure.
My top 10 list why the US economy is envy of the world:
- Rule of law
- Large domestic market
- Stable currency
- Most developed financial markets
- Entrepreneurial culture
- Stable political system
- Abundant natural resources
- Research universities
- Immigration
- Federalism
Just like in a job interview, you should ask your potential investors questions, too.
Key questions:
• How big is your current fund?
• How active are you in this market?
• What’s your typical check size?
• How does your process work?
• What does timing look like?
Come on, @newscientist, “deep-learning neural networks” are not “systems modelled on the way brains work”.
They are organized piles of matrix multiplication trained on amounts of data no human is ever exposed to, with only the vaguest connection to how actual brains work.