These are the shouts of an Iranian freedom-loving woman, who chants #JavidShah (Long Live the Shah) in the face of the criminal figures of the Islamic Republic regime
"Javid Shah" is the central slogan of Iranian protesters opposed to the Islamic Republic regime, expressing support for Reza Shah II Pahlavi—a support that continues to grow despite all the repression
@PahlaviReza@marklevinshow@MariaBartiromo@GilaGamliel@DrEliDavid@FoxNews
Iran's Rights in the Caspian Sea Are Not Negotiable.
The Islamic Republic, amid profound structural weakness and a deep crisis of legitimacy, is seeking to advance and implement the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea (the Aktau Convention). This effort, undertaken without the mandate of the Iranian people and without a clear and comprehensive guarantee of Iran's historic rights, is deeply concerning and constitutes a serious threat to Iran's national interests.
Under the 1921 and 1940 treaties between Iran and the Soviet Union, the legal regime governing the Caspian Sea was founded on the parties' shared rights and the principles of mutual agreement and common interests.
Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the newly independent states reaffirmed, in the Alma-Ata Declaration (December 1991), their commitment to the treaties of the former Soviet Union and to fulfilling the international obligations arising from those agreements through the successor states.
Accordingly, any fundamental change to the legal status of this strategically vital body of water must be made with the agreement of all littoral states and with full respect for Iran's rights.
However, the Aktau Convention provides for the conclusion of bilateral and multilateral agreements among the littoral states concerning portions of the seabed and subsoil of the Caspian Sea, areas that were previously part of the shared waters of Iran and the Soviet Union.
This sets a dangerous precedent. By circumventing the principle of consensus among all littoral states, it effectively weakens Iran's historic position and diminishes the country's role in determining the future legal status of the Caspian Sea.
Since the signing of the Aktau Convention in 2018, I have repeatedly warned that "national interests cannot be safeguarded from a position of weakness." At the time, I also stressed that the criminal clique ruling the Islamic Republic sacrifices the interests of the Iranian nation and homeland for its own survival, and that its foreign policy repeatedly resorts to concessions and appeasement from a position of weakness.
My position on the current process remains unchanged. I consider the Islamic Republic's attempt to ratify this convention to be contrary to Iran's national interests.
No decision concerning Iran's resources, borders, or sovereign rights in this strategic body of water can possess legitimacy without the genuine participation and consent of the Iranian people. Iran's rights in the Caspian Sea are not negotiable, nor can they be relinquished. Any action that undermines these rights will be recorded in the historical memory of the Iranian nation, and those responsible will ultimately be held accountable by the people of Iran.
A Must-Listen Conversation
Haviv Rettig Gur, analyst and journalist at The Times of Israel, speaks with Armin Navabi, an Iranian political activist, on the "Ask Haviv Anything" podcast
In this episode, Armin Navabi presents his perspective on the Iranian freedom movement and discusses Reza Shah II Pahlavi, making a number of points that many listeners may find informative and thought-provoking
This program is highly recommended for Israeli activists and anyone interested in learning more about contemporary Iranian political perspectives
Long live the #CyrusAccords
پاینده ایران
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
#JavidShah
@havivrettiggur@ArminNavabi
https://t.co/R56288BPFu
A deal that leaves the regime intact does not solve the problem. It preserves it.
The biggest misconception in Washington is that the problem is Iran’s nuclear program. It’s not.
Even without a nuclear weapon, the Islamic Republic would still fund Hezbollah, arm the Houthis, kill American forces, take American hostages, and destabilize the Middle East.
My interview with @ErickStakelbeck:
Prince Reza Pahlavi: "A free and democratic Iran is not merely an Iranian interest. It is one of the most consequential strategic opportunities available to the free world in this generation."
Black Sea Security Forum
Ukraine, May 30 2026
No nation in the Middle East is more supportive of the United States than the freedom-loving people of Iran
The patriotic and liberty-seeking people of Iran — led by Reza Shah II Pahlavi — also seek the best possible relationship with Israel and support the creation of a “#Cyrus_Accord” between Iran and Israel
Do not turn the Iranian people against you by compromising and dealing with the occupying and criminal regime ruling Iran
Think about the long-term future of the Middle East and the world
@POTUS@realDonaldTrump@SecRubio@marklevinshow@LindseyGrahamSC@tedcruz@SEPeaceMissions@WhiteHouse@netanyahu@IsraeliPM@IsraelPersian@GilaGamliel@AmichaiChikli@gidonsaar