@BudElliott3 There’s nothing unique about 2023 compared to 2022 when it comes to the transfer portal. And in 2024 it jumps up a level.
And full NIL didn’t impact the game until 2024.
I have no clue why you keep using 2023 as the starting line.
@mdotbrown Part of this is on the guys too. Every champ looks like Tim’s spurs when they try to repeat. And why the validation take on TV today felt off.
There’s context for each, but MIL couldn’t guard Jimmy, Denver couldn’t dribble vs Minny, Knicks were built to beat the C’s, Chet vs SA
@AndyStaples Jerry Jones employs Dak Prescott, not Roger Goodell.
Ryan Day / OSU AD, etc is going to be the employer of Jeremiah Smith. Not Petitti
Every single FBS public would have to move the whole operation out of its scope to allow athletics to not be a state employee / employer
@DragonflyJonez Going to sit right next to LeBron’s 48 Special for me. Incredible to get that same feeling twice
Some details were different, but immediately after watching both live you can only think that the future is here NOW
@HuntIllini1997@cody_delonge@BudElliott3 Thats true, but those are not equal offsets at all. If it happened, would be massive net negative
And this whole conversation is about aligning incentives
If changing incentives get the sport closer to the nuclear path (big rivalry games mean less), then it should be considered
@HuntIllini1997@cody_delonge@BudElliott3 There is a world (very unlikely) where 10-1 or 9-2 rivals going into rivalry week are only playing for CFP seeding and rest some key players
Every benefit of CFP expansion (some valid) are bets that reality wont come.
If it doesnt = everyone wins
If it does = the sport is over
@JonesOnTheNBA Shaq and Kobe break up, Timmy is in an all time stable spot & he collects championships that elevate him vs his peers.
Not all of those are valid (I don’t agree with all of them). But they’ve existed throughout the history of the league and will be applied to this era too.
@JonesOnTheNBA This is just how it goes in sports.
People can have their own preferences, but consensus has been heavily influenced by the end-result forever.
Kareem “flounders” through the parity heavy 70’s and is called overrated. He gets Magic in ‘80 and retires as the GOAT.
@JBudDavis Not scheme specific, but isn’t this a high-end version of what Iowa or Jim Leonard’s Wisconsin have / were doing?
That’s the only comp I could land on as far as production vs BC talent
@ShehanJeyarajah@byjoelanderson The MAC and bottom of CUSA are struggling. I don’t think every FBS team today will play at an unregulated level for much longer (I’d ask how many of them even want to)
But that’s why I brought up 120 earlier. That was the FBS number in ‘08. I wonder how much this era will cut it
@ShehanJeyarajah@byjoelanderson It’s a risk! For sure.
But I’d think “football (and 🏀) become substantially deprioritized tools for enrollment” is a much less likely than say, “university attendance is deprioritized in American culture”.
They’re going to be the best tools the schools have for a long time
@ShehanJeyarajah@byjoelanderson There needs better language around what the actual fall of CFB would be. “unsustainability” I don’t think works. When do we think there’s going to be less than 120-125 teams playing “major”football? Football or basketball will be the front porch for how many schools for X years?
@ShehanJeyarajah@byjoelanderson Fair comps.
But that doesn’t point to unsustainably is the point. A good argument can be made it has or will be a worse product (I would not land there). But worse ≠ collapse.
@ShehanJeyarajah@byjoelanderson Is high school football unsustainable? Is AAU unsustainable?
It’s not the model a billion dollar business “should” be run on, but I don’t see how it stops working.
“Should be improved” Yes
“Will collapse / will fail” No