@Ibnalahwaz1 When you compile all of the statements of ibn Taymiyah his opinion becomes clear, The person who Does Major shirk is given the label of a kafir and a mushrik and is given the Hukm of a kafir and a mushrik after Hujjah using a single Quote out of context is tadlis.
Al Salam Alaikum,
Who remembers Liv ? She was a Christian who kept coming back to my panel and after months, she took her shahada.
She left her job working at a Christian ministry and ever since she hasn’t been able to support herself. She no longer has a home and is staying in extended hotels and sleeping in her car. I’ve been trying to help her as much as I can in the background but when I was she was sleeping in her car I was devastated.
I have verified all her claims and have been following her condition for a few months. If you would like receipts she’s willing to provide them upon request.
This is her link to help her if you guys would like:
https://t.co/e2i5rNeM33
My heart breaks for ex-Muslims.
Imagine going from worshipping the all-powerful God who saved Jesus and said that he was a blessing (19:31) and one of those closest to Allah (3:45), to thinking that you are so indebted to your Creator that an innocent man had to come down, take on the curse of the law (Galatians 3:13), and become a curse for you, being cursed by God, who curses another God, so that you can be forgiven by that very same God.
Imagine Christians genuinely thinking they are helping you by trying to convince you to believe in this WICKED concept.
@NPCfinde6 @MMetaphysician@Chainless_Slave@sneako no he isnt, what he is saying is that Jihad Does mean holy war and Allah says that in the Qur’an no need to water down our religion.
Some of the coping I’ve seen thus far, is that “there is no backbiting on the caller of Bid’a.”
As usual, this is a red herring. The issue has nothing to do with this being Gheebah, the issue is openly lying and deceptively swearing by Allah’s Name in a manner which you know is intended to deceive the questioner. This is pure lying and deception. The eventual concession of Shadee to being recorded only magnifies the cowardice, and doesn’t remove the intentionally deceptive Yameen that was employed. These young Fortnite Madkhalis haven’t been on Twitter for a month (or so), and there’s agreement amongst all parties of their deceptive and lying nature.
The ironic thing, and a side note — the very same narrations that indicate that there is no sanctity nor backbiting on the caller to Bid’a, it includes the unjust ruler (yet you’ll always find that part of the Athar missing when a Madkhali cites it, lol). Not that it applies to the existing Tawagheet, but it goes to show you the level of deception of these Zanadiqa, where they make speaking out against an unjust ruler, as being of the traits of the Khawarij.
Just to show you the extent of deception, of these filthy Madkhalis — Imam Harb Al Kirmani رحمه الله تعالى narrates:
بن أذينة قال: حدثنا أشياخنا قال: ثلاثة لا حرمة لهم ولا غيبة، الوالي الظالم الجائر، والفاسق المعلن بفسقه، وصاحب البدعة.
Ibn Udhayna said: Our shaykhs narrated to us, saying: “Three [types of people] have no sanctity, and [speaking about them] is not considered backbiting (ghība): the unjust, oppressive ruler; the open sinner who publicly displays his sin; and the person of innovation (bidʿah).”
Imam Ahmad رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة narrates:
حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ، حَدَّثَنَا الحَسَنُ بنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ الْجَرَوِيُّ، عَنْ ضَمْرَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ شَوْذَبٍ، عَنِ الْحَسَنِ قَالَ: “ ثَلَاثَةٌ لَا غِيبَةَ لَهُمُ: الْإِمَامُ الْخَائِنُ، وَصَاحِبُ الْهَوَى الَّذِي يَدْعُو إِلَى هَوَاهُ، وَالْفَاسِقُ الْمُعْلِنُ فِسْقَهُ “
ʿAbdullāh narrated to us: al-Ḥasan ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Jarawī narrated to us, from Ḍamra, from Ibn Shawdhab, from al-Ḥasan [al-Baṣrī], who said: “Three [types of people] have no ghība (i.e., speaking about them is not considered backbiting): the treacherous ruler/leader; the person of [heretical] desire who calls [others] to his desire; and the open sinner who publicly displays his sin.”
Perhaps these great Imams retracted before they died?
On type of being Zanadiqa themselves — apart from the Jahmi Qubūri — these teenage Madkhalis have no honor, nor baseline etiquette of even the average Kafir asli. The kid Mushrik in the video is actually known as being a liar by all parties who engage with him, so this isn’t surprising. He’s on record swearing by Allah in a lie, and generally lying, so this isn’t something new.
Imagine someone asking you point blank if you’re recording, and following it up with “is your phone recording” to indicate that he means is this call being recorded at all, because he suspected wordplay. For you to swear by Allah in the negative, whilst openly live streaming on a platform that automatically records lives, and knowing a group of your fellow Zanadiqa recording on top of that — is peak deception and lying. Which is what the Madkhali manhaj is built on. Anything to farm a clip right? Even lying whilst using Allah’s Name, والعياذ بالله. Not surprised these imbeciles are terrified of doing a Mubahalah on creed.
These kids’ own claimed scholars despise such behavior and call it deception and betrayal, and even label the liar from their creed as being worse than a Mubtadi’ (excluding the caller to said innovation).
Here’s the destroyed one Rabee, and the Sisi and Jahmi glazer Raslan speaking on this matter generally: