Thinking takes energy, so much so that fMRI/PET use measurements associated w energy metabolism as proxies for brain activity. But fMRI/PET lack cellular resolution. How is energy metabolism distributed in neurons? We examined in vivo and in C. elegans https://t.co/jsdMske30b 1/
Kind reminder: If you want to allow others to reuse Figures from your #preprint, e.g. to talk about your science in their presentations or on twitter, avoid licenses such as CC-BY-ND.
The "ND" stands for "no derivatives allowed"😉
#OpenAccess 🔓
Read more:
https://t.co/706zRwxpXq
@matryoshka_core @amandatoryfigs @LyrikAllure @starlitgf The effect is worse in a sedentary lifestyle because if cells need more glucose, e.g. muscle during exercise, then more blood glucose will be removed. So it’s not just eating sugar that is the problem; it’s the context of glucose demand by your body too
@_BRCooper @Rrrrolf @sam_d_1995 Cities on this scale are more like e.g. New Haven, Providence, or Portland (ME). Those cities have been around for several centuries, way before cars, and are far denser than Segovia. But I doubt we’ll ever see them change back because of the cultural block more than anything.
@perrymetzger There’s a great episode about this exact process on The G Word with Adam Conover. He is witness to an FDIC bank takeover drill. Fascinating stuff!
@mbeisen@ATinyGreenCell This is probably crazy, but could you open up a voting system for people to suggest preprints for review? And combine that with the system in place now (“editors’ choice” vs “popular choice”). Maybe adjusted to votes/views to account for popularity ranges.
@ericinellenwood@ChrisMurphyCT If we all had the same amount of money, I’d probably be okay with it. But some people stand to gain a LOT from this proposal.
@ericinellenwood@ChrisMurphyCT The plan eliminates all income, gift, and estate taxes. The rich earn from investments; that wealth will continue to earn for them without an hour’s work and will never be taxed again. They can transfer that wealth to anyone they want for free. There is no loop to find holes in.
@LukeyJ77@JoannaMang I was born in Corning and grew up calling that “upstate” so for me Binghamton would be too. I do distinctly remember thinking it was weird as a kid though; “isn’t it more like overstate?”
@C_Mike_Bennett @Sarumyan@mnolangray Yea all scales are arbitrary and one could probably argue for any system equally. Farenheit used (supposedly) a cold winter day as 0, and the human body temp as 96, so he could easily subdivide the scale. It is useful, but not necessarily moreso than a scale built around water.
@Sarumyan@mnolangray Designed for a very specific range of outdoor temperatures, and less appropriate for different climates and even for this modern era of changing patterns
@Sarumyan@mnolangray It is (unintentionally) roughly 0-100% of “common outdoor temperatures”. So 100F is a frequent hot temperature, 0F is about the bottom of the scale, and 50F is halfway between (not warm, not cold). Debatable, but that is the “intuitive” part (e.g. 70F=70% heat; pleasant)