@ClippyGroypa@goyunit@MatrixPrime_@MyronGainesX You know he want do that. I'll talk to him behind the scenes. And when the chat will try to answer on stream. I'll say I don't talk shit to my "friends" online.
To the USMS / BOP / Miami FDC @SecRubio:
As a former 1811 who personally processed and delivered hundreds of prisoners into this exact facility, I am raising a precise legal and operational concern regarding the Tate brothers.
They are currently on a USMS hold pending extradition approval/denial in proceedings.
They have not been convicted of any crime in the United States and, most importantly, are U.S. citizens, yet their status is that of extradition detainees.
Over more than three years of proceedings in Romania, the brothers appeared at every required court hearing and judicial proceeding — more than 40 in total — without missing a single one.
They even returned to Romania when summoned after travel restrictions were eased.
That is a clear and documented record of compliance.
Under Wright v. Henkel, 190 U.S. 40 (1903), bail in international extradition cases may be granted upon a showing of special circumstances. A consistent multi-year history of appearing for every required hearing constitutes precisely the type of special circumstance the Court contemplated. I formally request that the court give full and fair consideration to bond.
Further, under Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979), individuals detained pending judicial proceedings cannot be subjected to conditions that amount to punishment. Restrictions must be reasonably related to a legitimate governmental objective. Arbitrary or unnecessarily harsh treatment fails that standard.
As U.S. citizens who have not been charged with any crime in the United States, the Tate brothers should not be subjected to detention-like restrictions based solely on allegations made by a foreign government.
At a minimum, they should be released under reasonable supervision, with appropriate reporting requirements and assurances they will appear for all required U.S. proceedings, meetings, or hearings.
@USMarshalsHQ@OfficialFBOP @DAGToddBlanche @TheJusticeDept@StateDept
(1/9) YouTube: Reinstate Fresh&Fit Monetization And Stop Targeting Conservatives
We’ve been demonetized since Aug 2023, reapplied to YouTube Partner Program(YPP) multiple times, been denied without clear reasons or direct dialogue, so we have been forced to go public.
In Jan 2026, YouTube updated Advertiser-Friendly Guidelines: Non-graphic discussions/dramatizations of controversial/sensitive topics (e.g., domestic abuse, sexual harassment, self-harm, suicide, abortion) are now eligible for FULL ad revenue.
YouTube called old rules “too restrictive.” We restructured to compliant financial content with zero strikes, yet we were still denied on January 14, 2026.
@TeamYouTube@YouTube@YouTubeCreators@nealmohan
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH @TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators@YouTube!
We’ve been demonetized for nearly 3 years with ZERO ad revenue despite Trump winning, guidelines “softening,” and them bragging about favoring free speech & reinstating banned creators.
Policies loosened in 2025?
They unbanned COVID/election “misinfo” channels & loosened moderation under Trump pressure… but right-wing voices like us?
And I have EVIDENCE to prove it in the thread below!
They value “conservative voices” when it suits them, yet we’re bleeding money while lefty propaganda flows free.
Enough. @TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators@nealmohan@Jim_Jordan@realDonaldTrump
Fix this NOW or admit the bias never died.
RT if you’re fed up. Let’s make them feel the heat.