I discovered what appears to be a massive bug in Codex.
I’ve been running Goal in a single session for over nine days, and the app’s implementation is progressing almost too smoothly.
However, during that time, I noticed that the storage space on my MacBook’s 1TB SSD was decreasing dramatically. Since I had originally stored over 200GB of Blackmagic RAW data on it, I assumed that Xcode’s cache or Simulator files were taking up the space.
But the cause turned out to be something I never expected.
A large number of JSONL files, each about 1.5 GB, are likely being created in the Codex “sessions” folder with every turn. Since the storage usage is increasing gradually, I suspect that the extremely long thread context is being duplicated in its entirety for every turn. Shouldn’t this be an incremental copy? This is a huge problem in this era of skyrocketing SSD prices.
If anyone from oai is on it then at least acknowledge it??
This is a very very serious issue. You can easily find multiple versions of it, ssd io is not optimised at all, not even for nongoal asks
@thsottiaux@OpenAIDevs
I discovered what appears to be a massive bug in Codex.
I’ve been running Goal in a single session for over nine days, and the app’s implementation is progressing almost too smoothly.
However, during that time, I noticed that the storage space on my MacBook’s 1TB SSD was decreasing dramatically. Since I had originally stored over 200GB of Blackmagic RAW data on it, I assumed that Xcode’s cache or Simulator files were taking up the space.
But the cause turned out to be something I never expected.
A large number of JSONL files, each about 1.5 GB, are likely being created in the Codex “sessions” folder with every turn. Since the storage usage is increasing gradually, I suspect that the extremely long thread context is being duplicated in its entirety for every turn. Shouldn’t this be an incremental copy? This is a huge problem in this era of skyrocketing SSD prices.
@nunezvice@OpenAI can we not choose a default model? or voice only works on GPT 5, if yes, is there no option to spin up a reasoning agent with some other model selected?
since we'd not be using that for voice, but plain reasoning, shouldn't it be possible to do that?
Kimi K3 has received far more love than we expected, and our GPUs are feeling it.
Over the past 48 hours, demand has pushed close to the limits of our current capacity. To protect the experience of existing subscribers, we're temporarily pausing new subscriptions and prioritizing compute for current members. Existing subscribed users are not affected.
We're adding capacity as fast as we can and will reopen new subscription spots in batches.
Going forward, we'll also split membership into two more focused plans: Kimi Membership for Kimi Web, App, and Work; and Kimi Code Membership for coding workflows. This will help us match compute more precisely and keep the experience stable.
Thank you for your patience and understanding!
PREDICTION
after kimi k3 successful launch and mogs opus 4.8, Dario Amodei is gonna write an essay explaining how open-weight Chinese AI threatens democracy, national security, and the future of humanity
@BraedendotTECH Omg I’ve having the same exp
I’ve added lines in all my agentmd that’s not to reply with more than 15-20 lines unless i explicitly ask for it
I have dedicated review agents so i don’t have to read anything.
I rather come back and try to fix a bug than review it firsthand
@noahzender@tibor_tee Why not do a collection of such prompts a standalone feature?
For starters, keep this prompt marketplace seeded with prompts that cursor devs feel are really good, can accept user feedback and add ranking on it later on as well
@skeptrune Biggest issue with ai assisted review is, intent is missing. It can check the syntax validity without evaluating if said change is even needed.