@cL0h@cosaingalway@stockholm_cc The moral high ground is entirely the wrong tree to bark up. The real argument for cycling infrastructure lies in what you could call the moral low ground:
https://t.co/O8zIEIrrp9
@tvprp@Marc_dingdong Surely that's what the Highway Code states, not the law. There's no legislation about passing on the left; it's only an offence if it can be proven as S3RTA.
@PoliceHinckley Would you be able to clarify whether this was a head-on collision or a rear impact and, if the former, which side of the road it occurred on?
@PoliceHinckley Would you be able to clarify whether this was a head-on collision or a rear impact and, if the former, which side of the road it occurred on?
@LonelyJoeParker @RantyHighwayman Sure. Same here. But (and of course we're drifting away well from the original point here) the line between individually teaching defensive behaviour and a nationally institutionalised policy of instilling fear in potential victims isn't a particularly fine one.
Road safety campaigns encourage children to walk and cycle? Sadly, a seriously misguided assumption. This article explains (with data) why:
https://t.co/liV8JVkJyS