bhavanvitha

Writer, Poet- Finance Advisor, Political Observer, Artist

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@polysmind @BJP4India are self-employment figures part of this?

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

As #Congress takes #BJP head-on, the beneficiary would be only SP, BSP, TRS, BJD. Without fighting BJP, outsourcing it to#@RahulGandhi they would then subdue him and consolidate themselves at Center at least in 2019 term. #mahagathbandhan

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@AndhraPradeshCM @apepdcl Better plan needed so that as new work is undertaken, earlier works are completed with regard to worldbank electrification. For months more and more roads left dug for months. #visakhapatnam roads narrowed.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@CMD_APEPDCL @ncbn Better plan needed so that as new work is undertaken, earlier works are completed with regard to worldbank electrification. For months more and more roads left dug for months. #visakhapatnam roads narrowed.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@Indian2001Shibu @beindiya @RahulGandhi Not assembling, but manufactured on their own? I am sure with proper political support, they can do so. Afterall India needs to become self-sustainable.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@TVMohandasPai @PMOIndia @narendramodi @buzzindelhi @sureshpprabhu @sanjeevsanyal @rsprasad @surjitbhalla I think its getting too much. Can't they speak all these post-election? Let BJP focus on other issues more central to peoples welfare.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@MisraAmaresh Is 36 better than 0 due to non-purchase after so many years? are governments now allowed to purchase at all for fear of paralysis. how many purchases and amount of defence expenditure since independence and the party that made it?

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

#SaveKeralaFromCommunists How come Kerala get turned into such troubled state? that too their own government create such situation? God's own country?

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

#CongMichelLinkCharge surprised if it was Vikas Gupta who should be saying other lawyers would come! these are initial stages? How he can say that. Without being presumption investigation to happen!

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

Saira Shah Halim
@sairashahhalim Justifies "Smashing Brahminical Patriarchy". How worse can hatred and personal bias get? #JackDorsey #JackMustApologise and see the people in that pic.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@akanshathakur7 Only men have the duty of fulfilling their oath of austerity and abstinence and deeksha. Women make creation possible and above men and are considered Jaganmata. They don't need to make any offering or perform any deeksha and the temple is for men to take up the duty ie deeksha.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@sailesh2000 In #Sabarimal believers are expected to visit only if they have devotion of Swami as a Brahmachari. If they don't have, they won't be devotees and so have no duty to visit. It's a peculiar situation where you don't enter if you are a devotee if you are a woman as there is no duty

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@republic @People4Dharma @3DArnab Why Duty being viewed as Right? Why this point being ignored? Don't you notice similar rigorous Duty in other religions too? @RahulEaswar Duty is Oath/Deeksha for men to abstain. This obligation is not for others. It's not prayer but offering.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@republic @3DArnab What if rather than a right it's considered as a duty? where is discrimination? where is impurity? it's a psychological deeksha to improve on one's nigraham, abstinence. it's good for society.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@republic temple is meant for the constitution of biological men as a duty to perform deeksha that is very tough and only they are required to do as per belief. only in that temple. if judgement is for devotees and if you don't follow you are not a devotee so no need to visit 1/2

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@TimesNow @ARanganathan72 emphasizing that he is an atheist makes the argument and discussion more as a disclaimer to his own views. One can't compare any other situation to one where the deity is brahmachari and in that particular temple founded thus.!

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@TimesNow @sabarimaladebate #aranganathan It's against law that non-devotees, non-believers visit temples, non-believers in Tirumala are not allowed. Non-Hindus are required to submit a written letter, signed, that they believe in Lord Venkateswara. Doubt?

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@UnSubtleDesi It's against law that non-devotees and non-believers visit temples, non-believers in Tirumala are not allowed. Non-Hindus are required to submit a written letter, signed, that they believe in Lord Venkateswara.

[bhavanvitha @bhvnvitha]

@RatanSharda55 A simple doubt. If devotees only need to visit and pray, and devotees believe in Ayyappa, if they visit and it proves they are not devotees? Does it mean they shouldn't be visiting as per law? How can a devotee believe but yet visit? Is it Catch 22? TTD allows only believers.