Olivia
Online
Pinned Tweet
We'd like to introduce biaskllr/AI, a tool that uses AI to identify the presence of bias patterns & biased language in media.
learn more in our video. We invite you to check out our report archive at: https://t.co/r6RTl0efaf
Updated Daily!
#AI #Technology #medialiteracy
The Media Bias Data We’re Collecting at @biaskllrAI
This week we’ll get to pull a full month of bias data from biaskllr/AI and I can’t wait to see where it lands. We’re still finding our way around getting it connected to a good BI tool, but we’re rapidly building out data on bias found within the media.
Some are undoubtedly exactly what we anticipate, but the previews we’ve seen so far showed a few surprises.
One of the keys is we’ll be figuring out not just who you should and should not trust, we’ll know on which topics it matters.
For example, things that don’t tightly intertwine with politics seem to be scoring better for most sites. Coverage of hurricanes, day-to-day crime, most local news seem to be generally good. Nothing’s perfect, but good.
We’ll also be able to release ranked average scores for those who hit a minimum analysis threshold. In addition, we’ll have a list of the cleanest articles — to help people recognize quality journalism. But there will also be a list of the worst.
It will ruffle some feathers, but we’ll run whatever the data says.
A big part of this mission is the help people see through the bias in the information we take in. That’s not just news, but memes and YouTube and speeches etc.
If you haven’t, please take a few and check the tool out. There’s a true freemium version, and the more articles users analyze between now and 11:59pm on Sept 30, the more useful the data will be. :)
Link in comment below 👊🏼
Bias Score™: 85
Score Rationale: The article from AP News presents information in a neutral and factual manner, focusing on the legal aspects of the Arizona voter citizenship proof case. It provides quotes from both sides of the argument, including from state officials and civil rights advocates, without overtly favoring one perspective over the other. However, there is a slight emphasis on the concerns raised by civil rights groups, which may influence readers to view the state’s actions more critically. The language used is generally neutral, but the framing of certain issues could subtly guide readers toward a particular interpretation.
Article URL: https://t.co/m5JEugVVjZ
Publisher: AP News
Bias Detected: Low
Bias Category: Framing Bias, Source Bias
Context and Omissions: The article does not delve deeply into the broader national debate over voter ID laws or the history of similar laws in other states, which could provide additional context for understanding the significance of Arizona’s legal battle. Including more background on the national implications of voter ID laws might offer readers a more comprehensive view.
Implicit Bias: The article implicitly leans toward the civil rights groups' perspective by giving more space to their concerns about disenfranchisement, though it does not explicitly endorse their position.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
A note from our founder @CoreyNoles today about division in our society, and how we hope biaskllr can help — even on a small level.
Join us and help be a part of the solution.
Bias Score™: 85
Score Rationale: The article from Politico discusses a deal between Microsoft and Constellation Energy for nuclear power supply. The language used is largely neutral, focusing on factual reporting of the deal, its potential impact on carbon emissions, and the broader context of energy sourcing. There are a few instances where the article leans towards a positive framing of nuclear energy, which could be seen as favoring one side of the energy debate. However, these instances are not frequent or severe enough to significantly detract from the overall neutrality. The article does not appear to omit critical counterpoints or opposing views, and the tone remains professional throughout.
Article URL: https://t.co/dUycNtEZfa
Publisher: Politico
Bias Detected: Low/Medium
Bias Category: Framing Bias, Source Bias
Context and Omissions: The article does not delve deeply into potential criticisms of nuclear energy, such as concerns about waste disposal, safety, or public opposition. Including these perspectives could have provided a more balanced view of the topic.
Implicit Bias: The article implicitly supports the idea that nuclear energy is a positive solution for reducing carbon emissions, without fully exploring alternative energy sources or the downsides of nuclear power.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 65
Score Rationale: The article presents a mix of factual reporting and opinionated commentary. While the subject matter is newsworthy and relevant, the tone leans toward casting Donald Trump in a particular light, with some selective emphasis on his past statements and actions that may alienate Jewish voters. The language used in the article subtly frames the narrative in a way that could influence readers' perceptions, particularly by focusing on controversial remarks without providing extensive context on Trump's broader relationship with Jewish communities. The article also includes quotes from individuals with clear political stances, which adds to the bias. However, it does include some balance by mentioning Trump's support for Israel and his past policies, which prevents the bias from being overly one-sided.
Article URL: https://t.co/C5PegeJOXy
Publisher: Politico
Bias Detected: Medium
Bias Category: Political Bias, Framing Bias, Selective Omission
Context and Omissions: The article could benefit from a more comprehensive exploration of Trump's policies that appealed to Jewish voters, such as his administration's role in moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. While the article mentions some of these points, they are not given equal weight compared to the focus on his more controversial statements. Additionally, the perspectives of Jewish voters who continue to support Trump are not explored in depth.
Implicit Bias: The article implicitly suggests that Trump's actions and rhetoric have primarily alienated Jewish voters, without fully exploring the diversity of opinions within the Jewish community. This could lead readers to assume that Jewish voters are more uniformly critical of Trump than they may actually be.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 78
Score Rationale: The article presents a straightforward report on Vice President Kamala Harris's interview with Wired magazine, focusing on her comments related to her role and the political landscape. The article maintains a generally neutral tone, though there are subtle framing choices that could influence perception, such as highlighting specific quotes or emphasizing certain aspects of her political stance. However, these instances are relatively infrequent and do not significantly detract from the overall neutrality of the piece.
Article URL: https://t.co/hrsrAE6yli
Publisher: The Hill
Bias Detected: Low/Medium
Bias Category: Political bias, Framing bias
Context and Omissions: The article does not delve deeply into opposing viewpoints or criticisms of Harris’s statements, which could provide a more balanced perspective. It also lacks broader context regarding the political climate or alternative perspectives on the issues she discusses.
Implicit Bias: There is a subtle implicit bias in favor of Harris, as the article tends to present her comments without significant scrutiny or challenge, which could influence readers to view her statements more favorably.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 75
Score Rationale: The article presents a balanced overview of the Postmaster General's response to criticism over mail-in ballots, but there are subtle indications of bias. While the primary focus is on factual reporting, the article includes selective quotes and emphasizes certain criticisms over others, which may slightly sway the reader towards a particular interpretation. The language used is mostly neutral, but there are instances where the framing of certain criticisms could be perceived as favoring one side of the debate. The article does not overtly push a specific agenda, but the focus on certain aspects of the issue over others creates a minor imbalance.
Article URL: https://t.co/BBE0AkSfwG
Publisher: The Hill
Bias Detected: Low/Medium
Bias Category: Framing bias, Selective omission
Context and Omissions: The article could have provided more context regarding the broader debate on mail-in ballots, including historical perspectives or alternative viewpoints on the criticisms raised. Additionally, it might have been useful to include more detailed responses from the Postmaster General to the various criticisms, as well as perspectives from non-partisan experts.
Implicit Bias: The article implicitly leans towards highlighting the criticisms of mail-in ballots without fully exploring the counterarguments or the broader context of the debate. This creates a subtle bias in how the issue is presented to the reader.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 85
Score Rationale: The article appears to present the facts of the case regarding the Ohio pastor's prison sentence for involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot with minimal editorializing. The language is largely neutral, focusing on the details of the sentencing, the pastor's actions, and the legal consequences. There are no overt attempts to sway the reader's opinion in favor of or against the subject. However, slight bias is detected in the framing of the pastor's actions, which may reflect a general societal stance on the January 6th event. These instances are low in severity and frequency, contributing to a generally balanced tone.
Article URL: https://t.co/KirmdB4Jnu
Publisher: The Hill
Bias Detected: Low
Bias Category: Framing Bias
Context and Omissions: The article provides sufficient context regarding the pastor's involvement in the January 6th event and the legal proceedings. It does not omit any critical information that would significantly alter the reader's understanding of the case.
Implicit Bias: While the tone remains neutral, there is a subtle implicit bias in how the pastor's actions are framed in a broader societal context. The article does not delve into potential motivations or justifications from the pastor's perspective, which could slightly influence reader perception.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 88
Score Rationale: The article from Reuters provides a factual account of the European Union's warning to Georgia regarding the potential suspension of visa-free travel if upcoming elections are not free and fair. The tone is neutral, and the language is largely objective, sticking to verified statements from EU officials and relevant stakeholders.
There are no obvious instances of loaded language or emotional appeals. The article avoids taking a stance on the issue, instead presenting the facts as they are. The only minor bias detected is in the choice of quotes, which slightly emphasizes the EU's concerns over Georgia's political situation, but this is balanced by the inclusion of context regarding Georgia's aspirations for EU membership. Overall, the article maintains a high level of objectivity.
Article URL: https://t.co/wV6mZBMamp
Publisher: Reuters
Bias Detected: Low
Bias Category: None
Context and Omissions: Article is sufficiently thorough. It provides necessary context regarding Georgia's relationship with the EU and the significance of visa-free travel for Georgian citizens. There are no major omissions that would significantly alter the reader's understanding of the situation.
Implicit Bias: No clear implicit bias detected. The article appears to be focused on reporting the facts without favoring any particular side.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 87
Score Rationale: The article from Reuters provides a factual overview of the Bank of Canada's concerns regarding the potential inflationary impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in the short term. The report is primarily based on statements made by the Bank of Canada, and the tone remains neutral throughout. There is no significant use of loaded language, and the article avoids making speculative or exaggerated claims. While the article focuses on the potential downsides of AI, it does not seem to omit key counterpoints or alternative perspectives that would lead to a significant bias. The overall presentation is balanced, though a slight emphasis on inflationary concerns without exploring potential long-term benefits of AI could be seen as a minor bias.
Article URL: https://t.co/rvo5qO6Vww
Publisher: Reuters
Bias Detected: Low
Bias Category: Slight emphasis on economic risks without fully exploring potential benefits
Context and Omissions: The article could have included more discussion on the potential long-term benefits of AI or the ways in which AI could mitigate inflationary pressures in the future. However, the article is sufficiently thorough for its focus on short-term economic concerns.
Implicit Bias: The article implicitly emphasizes the risks of AI with respect to inflation, which could lead readers to focus more on the negative short-term impacts rather than a balanced view that includes potential long-term advantages.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 88
Score Rationale: The article is largely fact-based, focusing on events and statements from different sources. The tone is neutral, with little emotive language or subjective commentary. However, there are a few subtle choices in phrasing that could influence the reader's perception, particularly in how certain quotes are framed. The article avoids extreme bias but includes a few minor instances of selective emphasis, which slightly lowers the score.
Article URL: https://t.co/mobnwwyDrQ
Publisher: BBC News
Bias Detected: Low
Bias Category: Framing, Selective Emphasis
Context and Omissions: Article is sufficiently thorough. No major omissions are detected that would significantly alter the reader's understanding of the event or issue.
Implicit Bias: There is a slight implicit bias in the way certain quotes are highlighted or given more prominence over others. This could subtly steer the reader's perception of the issue, but it is not overtly manipulative.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 65
Score Rationale: The article shows a moderate amount of bias, primarily in its tone and framing. While there is an attempt to present facts, the language used to describe certain political figures and actions leans towards a particular perspective, which may influence reader perception. There are some loaded terms and selective emphasis on certain aspects of the story, which slightly detracts from neutrality. The article does not appear to engage in overt misinformation but could benefit from more balanced language and broader context.
Article URL: https://t.co/QEmE2YOk4k
Publisher: CNN
Bias Detected: Medium
Bias Category: Political bias, framing bias
Context and Omissions: The article does not fully explore the perspectives of opposing political figures or parties, which could provide a more balanced view. Additionally, there is limited historical context regarding similar legislative efforts or comparisons to past instances of Secret Service protection changes, which could help readers better understand the significance of the bill.
Implicit Bias: There is a subtle bias in the portrayal of political motivations, where certain actions are framed as more or less legitimate depending on the political affiliation of the individuals involved. This could lead readers to form opinions based on incomplete information.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 65
Score Rationale: The article appears to frame the situation in a way that portrays one side of the conflict (pro-Palestinian activists) in a negative light, using terms like "agitators" and emphasizing acts of vandalism and flag removal. There is a lack of representation of the viewpoints of those involved in the protests, which contributes to a bias against them. The language used is somewhat loaded, and the article does not provide much context on the broader geopolitical issues or motivations behind the protests. This leads to a moderate deduction in the score due to both the severity and frequency of bias.
Article URL: https://t.co/7h6Kh5IugT
Publisher: Fox News
Bias Detected: Medium
Bias Category: Loaded Language, Omission of Counterpoints, Framing Bias
Context and Omissions: The article focuses heavily on the actions of the protesters without providing context on why these protests are occurring or the perspectives of the demonstrators. There is also no mention of any official statements from the university or other parties involved, which could provide a more balanced view of the situation.
Implicit Bias: The use of terms like "agitators" and the focus on vandalism implies a negative view of the protesters without fully exploring the reasons behind their actions or providing a balanced perspective on the conflict.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 77
Score Rationale: The article appears to be relatively balanced in its reporting of the Secret Service protection bill, but there is some editorial framing that leans toward a conservative perspective. However, the article does not appear to have excessive bias, and it provides factual information about the bill's passage in the House, which was unanimous. The bias score is lowered due to subtle framing and language choices that could influence reader perception.
Article URL: https://t.co/0s8G7KpD9s
Publisher: Fox News
Bias Detected: Low/Medium
Bias Category: Political bias, Emotional bias
Context and Omissions: The article does not provide much context about the broader implications of the bill beyond its connection to Trump. It also does not include perspectives from those who may oppose or have concerns about the bill, which could give readers a more comprehensive view of the issue.
Implicit Bias: The article implicitly frames the bill as a necessary response to threats against Trump, which could suggest that the former president is under greater danger than other political figures without providing data to support this.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 85
Score Rationale: The article provides a relatively balanced overview of California's housing laws and homelessness issues, with minimal use of emotionally charged language. It cites multiple sources, including government officials and advocacy groups, and presents both sides of the debate around Governor Gavin Newsom's policies. However, there is a slight tilt in favor of the state's efforts, with more emphasis on the potential benefits of new laws rather than their criticisms. The article could have included more voices from those directly affected by homelessness to offer a fuller perspective.
Article URL: https://t.co/RXaydFWkOh
Publisher: Associated Press (AP)
Bias Detected: Low/Medium
Bias Category: Framing, Source Bias
Context and Omissions: The article focuses heavily on the legislative actions taken by the state government and provides limited space to critics of these policies. While it mentions opposition, it doesn't delve deeply into alternative solutions or the perspectives of those who may be most affected by homelessness, such as the homeless population itself.
Implicit Bias: There is a slight implicit bias in favor of the state government and Governor Gavin Newsom, as the article highlights the potential positive impacts of the new laws without equally emphasizing possible downsides or failures.
Tags: California, housing, homelessness, Gavin Newsom, legislation, state government, Associated Press
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Bias Score™: 85
Score Rationale: The article from the Associated Press provides a factual recount of events, focusing on a recent rocket attack in Israel and the involvement of Hezbollah. The language used is largely neutral, with a clear effort to present both sides of the conflict. However, there is a slight leaning towards emphasizing the Israeli perspective, as Israeli government statements and military responses are given more detailed coverage than Hezbollah's or other regional actors. The article avoids inflammatory language, but there is a subtle imbalance in how the different parties are portrayed, which slightly affects the overall neutrality.
Article URL: https://t.co/b6BP7VkuyF
Publisher: Associated Press (AP)
Bias Detected: Low/Medium
Bias Category: Geopolitical bias, Source bias
Context and Omissions: The article could benefit from more context about Hezbollah's motivations and the broader geopolitical implications of the conflict. While Israel's perspective is well-covered, the motivations and viewpoints of other regional actors, such as Lebanon or Hezbollah, are less explored. This omission could lead to an incomplete understanding of the situation.
Implicit Bias: There is a slight implicit bias in favor of Israel, as Israeli military actions and justifications are presented with more detail and urgency compared to Hezbollah's actions or statements.
Tags: Israel, Hezbollah, rocket attack, Mideast tensions, Associated Press, Lebanon, military conflict, geopolitics
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
In this scenario, I feel like WE are the moon.
https://t.co/nXYZ4fbRbo
Ever shared an article and immediately wished you could take it back? 😬
We’ve all been there!
With biasKLLR/AI, you can quickly spot any bias in an article before you hit that share button. No more accidental misinformation.
Try it for free with any article you want and see for yourself. 📰💡
https://t.co/Hp7ieqVcIj
Good piece on @sama and his “villain era.” Not as critical as the headline implies. Decent Bias Score though…
⬇️⬇️
Bias Score™: 82
Score Rationale: The article presents a relatively straightforward report on OpenAI's fundraising efforts and its CEO, Sam Altman. It appears to rely on factual information and includes quotes from relevant stakeholders. However, there are some subtle biases in the language used, particularly regarding Altman's leadership and the framing of OpenAI's challenges, which could influence reader perception.
The article contains some mildly subjective terms like "rough start" and "struggles," which could have been framed more neutrally. Additionally, the article does not provide much in the way of counterpoints or broader context, such as perspectives from critics or alternative views on the company's trajectory, which impacts its neutrality.
Article URL: https://t.co/JQwNmonNuQ
Publisher: Business Insider
Bias Detected: Low/Medium
Bias Category: Framing Bias, Language Bias
Context and Omissions: The article does not provide alternative viewpoints or criticisms of OpenAI's fundraising efforts or Altman's leadership. It also omits details about the broader AI industry and how other companies are faring, which could give readers a more balanced understanding of the situation.
Implicit Bias: The article subtly portrays Sam Altman in a more favorable light by focusing on his efforts to raise funds despite challenges, without delving deeply into potential criticisms or failures. This could lead readers to form a more positive impression of Altman and OpenAI than warranted by a more balanced report.
This analysis uses biaskllr/AI™ technology. Remember, no analysis is completely free of bias; this is provided for educational purposes only. © 2024 biaskllr/AI™. ver. 1.3.1
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
瀬川深 Segawa Shin
Seen from Japan
Mahnoor,_raza♨️
Seen from United Arab Emirates
M. A
Seen from Jordan
Ahmed Talep
Seen from Switzerland
Brittany Ellice ( 1.6k)
Seen from Australia
SEVISGENLER 🔞
Seen from Turkey
مختلف🔥🤤
Seen from Kuwait
Zainy
Seen from Saudi Arabia
Haso
Seen from Turkey
Guti 
Seen from Mexico
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
113.8M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.6M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.6M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.6M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
72.8M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
65.8M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers