Bidoens

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@FitInvest_Nico Pour le nucléaire et la Chine ce sont des etf que tu as choisis? Si oui, lesquels? Tu investis via quelle banque?

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@FitInvest_Nico Si je ne me trompe pas il existe la version JEQA qui elle est capitalisante?

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@FitInvest_Nico Ok merci. Mais pour la Belgique est ce qu'un ETF acc n'est pas plus intéressant pour ne pas passer chaque fois pas ce précompte? Surtout que tu utilises les dividendes reçues pour réinvestir (en payant TOB +frais de transactions de la banque/plateforme).

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@cole_charts X-Fab n'est pas baissier à court terme? A vendre et racheter plus bas? Tu en penses quoi?

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@cole_charts Les deux sont super intéressants! Une partie du portefeuille en court terme et l'autre en long long terme DCA 👌

[Solver @solver_cs]

A message for the Foundation, out of care, not hate.

The solution for the #MultiversX problems (which are obvious at this point, nobody can deny them anymore) is simple: you fix what you did wrong, you sell #xPortal and #xMoney, and you put that money back into #MultiversX.

It’s clear that xPortal and xMoney are not bringing any real value to MultiversX, and they’ve already burned tons of money on those companies. xMoney isn’t even running on MultiversX, it’s running on #SUI 🤯, and xPortal is basically a multichain wallet already.

That’s how you correct your mistakes: you reset, you refocus, and then you start giving grants to external businesses that actually want to build something valuable on-chain. That’s how you make sure you’ll have the money to pay the people still working on the chain, removing the constant selling pressure for years. The Foundation is not supposed to build products, their only focus should be #MultiversX, nothing else.

And if the founders want to keep those companies, let them buy them themselves and put the money back into #MultiversX. It’s obvious they see a big opportunity in the #stablecoins business, so if they’re passionate about it, let them buy the company, become 100% stakeholders, and leave MultiversX out of it. Why should MultiversX fund their personal ambitions? Put some skin in the game with your own money, not with the Foundation’s.

[GRM @grm_off]

Few questions abt the "$EGLD new economic framework"

(RT to get anwers)

🔵 capital inflow ($100M target)

- Elrond has historically failed to attract meaningful external capital (minimal fundraising, Skynet Capital’s $40M never materialized in 2022). What makes this new target credible?
- Why should institutional or long-term investors believe MVX can now deliver on capital inflows when past commitments did not materialize?

🔵 staking ratio & security

- Staking ratios tend to fall during bull markets because users prefer liquidity and higher DeFi yields. Why would MVX be any different?
- Isn’t focusing on a higher staking APR missing the real issue? The real driver of staking growth elsewhere has been liquid staking and the on-chain utility of LSTs.
- How will #MultiversX make staked assets productive in DeFi, rather than just offering a bigger APR?

🔵 the perpetual budget & governance

- A perpetual budget is only valuable if funds are allocated effectively. Given that Elrond and MVX historically failed to deploy resources efficiently, why should this time be different?
- What governance structures are in place to prevent waste, insider capture, or misallocation?
- How will results be measured, reported, and independently audited?

🔵 revenue growth & ecosystem development

- The 100x revenue growth target relies entirely on builders creating apps that fill blockspace. What is the actual business development strategy to attract and retain serious builders?
- Past initiatives like Growth Games were clear failures. What has changed in the approach?
- Without a stronger value proposition compared to Ethereum, Solana, Sui, Base, BNB... why would top builders come to MVX?

🔵 buybacks & burn

- Buybacks and burns are meaningless without activity and demand. Why focus on this narrative before addressing the fundamental issue of ecosystem growth?

🔵 emission (9.47% "Growth Budget")

- A 9.47% annual emission rate is extremely high and directly contradicts the original capped supply promise. Why dilute existing holders now?
- Won’t this simply add constant sell pressure from stakers, builders, and the foundation itself?
- How can the market trust MVX when the scarcity narrative is being abandoned in favor of inflation? (ping @vinibarbosabr)

🔵 the Growth Fund DAO

- Attracting builders requires proactive business development, not just DAO-based grant committees. Why frame this as a DAO when what is needed is execution and partnerships? (ping @Daniel_Serb 🙃)
- How will builders be incentivized to choose MVX over ecosystems that already have liquidity, users, and proven growth programs?
- What KPIs will funding be tied to, and how will accountability be enforced?

🔵 RSI mint for DAT (the "Scammer Playbook" concern - ping @Justin_Bons)

- Isn’t minting new $EGLD for Digital Asset Treasury deals just disguised fundraising, with the cost borne by current holders through dilution?
- How is this different from the familiar "scammer playbook" where new tokens are minted, strategic investments are promised, and the funds are later sold?
- What exact market triggers allow RSI minting, and how do you prevent manipulation?
- Who decides when and how these mints are activated, and what prevents insider capture?
- Even if tokens are locked for three years, won’t markets immediately price in the future dilution?
- What guarantees exist that RSI funds will be deployed productively, with transparent reporting and independent audits?
- How can this coexist with the original scarcity narrative without destroying credibility?

What is MVX’s unique competitive advantage in today’s environment of modular chains, L2s, and appchains?

How do you solve the chicken-and-egg problem of attracting builders without users, and users without apps?

What makes this new framework fundamentally different from the incentive programs that have already failed across so many other L1s ?

How do you expect to be taken seriously with such cringe-worthy images? 🤣

[GRM @grm_off]

🟣 $XMN V2: Better, but still far from the mark.

TL;DR:

✅ Longer vesting for Team & Private: better.
✅ Finer split (Treasury vs Liquidity, Ecosystem, Legal): clearer on paper.
✅ UTK lockers prioritized for first dated unlock: a real queue advantage.

❌ TGE float = 5%: unchanged; the unlock wall remains.
❌ Buy-backs undocumented: unchanged; no structural buy pressure.
❌ New early-unlock buckets (Ecosystem, Legal): new vectors for de-facto concentration and discretionary use.
❌ Proof after vote/launch: unchanged philosophy, problematic timing.

Read below for more, comment & share 🫶

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@solver_cs 👀 do you have the same information on a longer timeframe? Like 2 years timeframe?

[GRM @grm_off]

🧵 My thoughts after the xMoney team's X Spaces event on the launch of $XMN:

1/ xMoney calls itself an "MVX project".
Problem: there’s no clear mention of MultiversX in the $XMN Whitepaper.

After pushback, a few mentions appeared on the site (photo).

[DivXMaN @crypto_div]

Here's how you make the $UTK to $XMN deal fair. Use the same supply for XMN and once you freeze UTK the opening XMN value should match the frozen UTK value.

No dilution, no locking period nonsense. Transition the token on SUI, let UTK holders get their value 1:1 without any dilution. Allow new users to come in on the new platform at par with existing holders.

If the team believes in what comes next- this is the way to do it. What I can't support is a blatant attempt to let your existing holders who funded the platform in the first place take all the risk again. Sorry- this nonsense needs to stop.

[Fast @fastxyz]

FastSet is on fire!
We’re routinely clearing 100K TPS and doing it smooth.

🟣 Blazing speed
🟣 Rock solid finality
🟣 Built to scale

And we’re just getting started.

[Fast @fastxyz]

On Web3 Insights with @Blockchain_Azza, @RosuGrigore drops alpha on how FastSet rips 100K+ TPS, smashes fragmentation, powers verifiable computing, and scales Web3 to infinity.

Full episode next post ↓

[Fast @fastxyz]

The Pi² Reactor Game is now live ⚡️

🖱️ Every click = a transaction sent, finalized & settled in real time
⌛ Every session = a stress test of FastSet’s speed

Play to uncover π² decimals: 9.8696xxxx.
Play to earn points. Play to have fun.

More details ↓

[TraderSZ @trader1sz]

When $BERT hits $1 I will give 100 people $1000 dollars of Bert tokens or 200 people $500 of Bert tokens. Will decide at the time

This isn’t copy pasta as before.

Bookmark this

Like share and rt to be eligible. People will be picked at random from those who rt or quote rt

Also must be following @bertcoincto X account

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@BitcoinCouteau @CryptoFuegoYT Des intérêts payés sur btc et autres cryptos? Le meilleur spread? Fees? Ça commence drôlement à ressembler à Celsius..🧐

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@rovercrc @grok Pick me 🤞🙂

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@Crypto__Goku @bitstack 👀

[Bidoens @bidoens]

@MarzellCrypto @grok Pick me Grok 🤞!