I analyzed over 40 matches to find the strongest class in Grand Arena @Moku_HQ . 🔄
These results can upgrade your whole approach 👇
→ The class with the highest MVP impact
Every class can shine, but some stand out more often.
- Bruiser (7 MVP): appearances with 400 damage, 200 defense and 200 fortitude, offering strong damage, solid durability and more frequent gacha ball respawns.
- Flanker (7 MVP): with 200 in every stat except fortitude, creating a nearly perfect balance.
- Grinder (6 MVP): with 200 damage, 200 dexterity and 400 fortitude, giving high speed while carrying the gacha ball and faster ball regeneration.
- Center (6 MVP): with 200 in every stat except dexterity, which works even better if your Moki already has a strong base stat.
→ Which class should you choose to win duels
The data points clearly to fortitude and damage as the two core stats for winning most encounters, especially because of the speed advantage when grabbing the gacha ball and the shorter regen timers.
Still, balance matters. In a 3 vs 3, excelling in one area means nothing if you leave another uncovered.
→ Final thought
Choosing your class with intention is an instant win rate boost. Knowing what each stat does is the secret.
there's enough good tokens that exist already, but sure i will airdrop portions of the creator fees that have been directed to my pump fun profile
retweet this + follow me on there + comment with your pump profile & ill pick randomly weekly
https://t.co/76P6JvAOay
Thanks for the response, much clearer now.
If you had to recommend a structure for small accounts, what would it be?What I used to do: 1 CBO at $50/day with 20-30 ads, pushing 3 quality ads daily.
Problem is Meta picks 1-3 ads max and starves the rest. They never get a real test, and when the winning ad dies, the campaign dies with it and takes forever to find another winner.
My idea was what I mentioned earlier: small budget ABO for testing, promote potentials to a higher budget CBO.
Not for perpetual learning like your method — just to spot winners with the least budget burned and as fast as possible.
Any thoughts or advice would help.
Thanks for the info, I'm stuck on exactly this question.
My setup: ABO for testing, $1-2 per adset. After 2-3 days, the adsets with potential (CTR, CPM, ATC) move to a CBO with min/max budget caps per adset.
This CBO has higher budget and freedom to decide which of the potential winners are real winners, still testing but with more spend.
My doubt: is it ok to graduate adsets based only on upper-funnel signals, or better to keep them running until they hit a spend threshold tied to the purchase event (target CPA, BE CPA, 3x target CPA, etc) before deciding?
Curious how you'd handle it.
Or it's both worlds. CBO with a spending limit to test ads and give them the same opportunity, as well as a maximum limit for "safety" against bad decisions.
Or, alternatively, ABO, with the "20% shared budget" feature activated, to give the meta team more decision-making power.
That's what I see now
The only problem I've noticed is that a very small budget spread across different ads can take longer to determine the best ones. Typically, the meta will choose 1-2, even when there could be more.
One solution I've seen is to set a minimum spend per ad set and then move the ads with the best CTR to an ABO or CBO campaign, where only the most promising ads are found, and then allocate them a larger budget.
This would act as a pre-filter for those ad sets or ads with the greatest potential. Then, once you have the winning angle and buyer persona, you can launch it directly there.
I had a different perspective. Why not test in CBO with a minimal budget, as small as possible while still making sense?
The ads with the best CTR and stats move to ABO, where we prioritize the budget to achieve 3x the target CPA.
1- We can test many creatives in CBO with a small budget.
2- We prioritize those that provide early signals.
3- We can be more selective. We no longer burn through budget in ABO, but we also don't limit ourselves to just a few ads in CBO.
@matuniox My theory is that Meta sets a budget limit for each ad set. If you then add more ads to it, or if there are too many ads, it won't be useful. That's why it's better to have multiple ad sets with fewer ads each.
@tyler_bloom_@jforjacob I read that each ad has a maximum budget limit before the CPA is broken. So ideally, you should reach that budget point for each ad set and not change it, and do this for each ad set. ?
I understand that each ad set and ad goes through a learning phase. And Meta's AI gives you a pool of users; if it fails initially, it can cost a lot of money to find the winner.
On the other hand, by duplicating several ads, playing a random game, your chances are higher and you lose less money, because you're starting off on the right foot.
@nkecom Static images and videos. Should I keep them together in one ad set or split them up?
If you have 5 angles for one buyer persona, would you put them all in one ad set, or split them up by ad set (1 ad set = 1 angle)?