@WereAllWeds1867@BuildsByKB Dana White thinks football requires no talent because toddlers can play it.
Which is ironic considering he’s never competed at an elite level in either sport he’s built a career talking about.
Roy Keane on Jordan Henderson... 😬
“Clearly Jordan’s not fit - I don’t think he should be involved… I’ve heard people say they want him around the place - for what? Does he do card tricks? Does he have a sing song? Does he do quizzes in the evenings?”
@Leekie1867 Agreed. I think a version of the engagement panel should be implemented that includes representation across all fans/groups, with a framework that ensures it’s productive and the club takes it seriously.
@kr62209@Dunsbyowl Cheers Kris, and the whole team. Only when you folks took over did we become a competently run club. Which is pretty amazing since a few folk told us you’d been sacked about 3 times since November 😂
Best wishes fella.
@stuartalker EFL treat insolvency as one-size-fits-all. But there’s a clear difference between using administration to wipe debts and being forced into it. We’ve already been hit with -18, so why another -15 on top? It’s a guideline, it’s discretionary and thankfully common sense prevailed.
@therealtbailey Would love to know what his game was here. Could’ve for some cash, ended up with nowt. Happy with that like, but just doesn’t make sense.
The EFL has sanctioned Sheffield Wednesday consistently since 2018.
Over that period, the club has been hit with multiple transfer embargoes spanning nearly a decade. By October 2025, Wednesday were under six simultaneous embargoes — the most any club has ever faced.
On top of that, the club has suffered repeated points deductions. A -12 deduction in 2020/21 severely damaged recruitment and momentum going into that season. Although it was later reduced to -6 on appeal, the damage had already been done — those points ultimately proved the difference between survival and relegation to League One.
In 2025, the situation worsened further. The club received:
•-12 points for entering administration, after the former owner failed to meet basic financial obligations such as paying wages and bills on time
•A further -6 point deduction, again due to the owner’s failure to uphold his responsibilities
This is not a case of a club gaining an unfair advantage — quite the opposite. The club has been placed at a significant competitive disadvantage for years due to sustained mismanagement.
Sheffield Wednesday has endured one of the most damaging ownership periods a club of its size is likely to experience. The former owner’s approach has not only harmed the club financially but also created a toxic environment for staff and supporters alike.
And yet, despite this, there is now an expectation that the same owner should be repaid — while the club continues to face further punishment.
How can that be justified?
The new ownership group should not be penalised for the failures of the previous regime. They should be given the opportunity to restore stability to a club that has lacked it for nearly 26 years.
Imposing further sanctions — such as another -15 point deduction, spending caps, business plan restrictions, and transfer limitations — would only deepen the damage. It risks condemning the club to yet another relegation and prolonging the cycle of instability.
At some point, there has to be recognition that continued punishment is no longer corrective — it is excessive.
The club, its staff, and its supporters deserve the chance to move forward.
#FairDealForWednesday
@storchyowl