@mustafasuleyman Fair concerns, but one correction going around: Delaware's AIC isn't "zero human oversight." The design keeps an accountable human in the loop, with clear liability and capital requirements. That's the point of building it in a sandbox first.
@Prof_CarlaReyes@propelforward We see it differently, and that’s fine. Existing statutes allow conditions on the shield, but they don’t say whose intent an AI manager carries or whether its contracts bind. Thanks for the dialogue.
Charter competition is his larger theme, and it's one of the four weaknesses in that paper. That's why the AMC adds conditions instead of stripping them. If it's a race, it's one to raise the bar.
Agreed there are other tools for spotting agent conduct, and the AMC doesn't replace any of them. The question it answers is narrower: when an agent acts as the principal, holding assets and signing in its own name, who stands behind it? That's an entity question.
Whether corporate law is the right tool is exactly what the sandbox is meant to test before anything is permanent. From the general counsels we've spoke with - uncertainty from a legal perspective is the reason to explore this.
Thanks for the comments - I value your input.
@Prof_CarlaReyes@propelforward it's opt-in, not mandatory. The draft follows your bargain logic: personality and a shield, in exchange for an accountable member, capital, disclosure, and records. DE series LLCs already condition the shield on separate records.
@Prof_CarlaReyes@propelforward 5/ Finally - On regulating conduct, not form: agreed, and existing law applies to AMCs in full. But you can't regulate conduct if you can't tell who is behind it. That was LoPucki's point. The form is how you make the conduct attributable.
@propelforward 4/ Why would a founder choose it? Certainty. Today an AI-run LLC (the Bayern route) leaves open whether its contracts bind, how intent is attributed, and when a court pierces. Counterparties, banks, and insurers price that doubt. The AIC answers those questions in statute.
@propelforward 4/ It must disclose to counterparties that it's AI-managed, act only within a public statement of purpose, retain every input and output, and operate inside a supervised 30-month sandbox the state can shut down.
@Prof_CarlaReyes@propelforward 2/ I agree with your bargain framing. That's the design. The question is what the bargain costs when no human makes the day-to-day decisions. The AMC prices it: personality and a shield, in exchange for an accountable member, capital, disclosure, and records.
@Prof_CarlaReyes@propelforward 1) Thanks for your thoughts - A few clarifications. The AIC is not mandatory and never will be. It's an opt-in form inside a 30-month supervised sandbox. Every LLC using AI today stays exactly as it is. No one has to move, and DE isn't reaching other states' entities.
@propelforward 5/ So "you could already do this" is true. The question is whether you'd rather it happen in the dark or under rules. That's what the AMC is for.
@propelforward 3/ The Delaware AMC draft goes the other direction. A human or Delaware entity must be the sole member. The AMC must be adequately capitalized. Fraud and willful violations pierce the shield.
I’ve been experimenting with new hardware form factors for my assistant, Dom. My favorite so far: the deskPAL!
Dom now lives on my desk, can speak up to get my attention, and is connected to my calendar, email etc.
I find myself using him consistently throughout the day for brainstorming and making sure I don't miss anything.