Dont want it. Need it. Web3 enthusiast | Educator | Entertainment innovator | Exploring the intersection of blockchain, learning, and fun | Sharing insights, ne
OBN has a fixed total supply of 10,000,000,000.
This is the maximum supply of OBN and should not be confused with circulating supply, claimable supply, or unlock amount.
Not all OBN will enter circulation at once.
Because OBN supply is fixed, responsible distribution matters.
That is why Orbition is actively reviewing invalid activity, removing farmed and abusive accounts, and protecting real participants.
AI Mining is designed for valid participation, not bots, farmed accounts, or abuse.
Full tokenomics, including allocation, distribution structure, unlock rules, and claim process details, will be released through Orbition’s official channels before the next major phase of the roadmap.
Official Announcements:
https://t.co/9GuNhDz5nB
i came across a very interesting rwa perps liquidity comparison, sourced from exchange order books/api’s, and some things stood out immediately…
you’d want to read this! 👇
first, the gap between the top three and everyone else is larger than i expected
bitget, binance, and hyperliquid seem to be operating in a different tier when it comes to depth, while okx and bybit are noticeably behind based on the data observed
second, bitget consistently comes out on top across most of the pairs measured at both 5bps and 10bps depth
on the ai and semiconductor side, bitget ranked #1 in depth across nvda, tsm, and mu, arguably three of the most important names in the entire ai supply chain
[nvda dominates ai chips, tsm manufactures a huge portion of the world’s advanced semiconductors, and mu sits at the center of the hbm memory story, powering modern ai infrastructure]
on the mega-cap side, the gap was also interesting
msft’s depth was roughly 4x higher than the next closest venue, while tsla was around 2x higher
this is pretty important because liquidity is the part of rwa that almost nobody talks about
why?
everyone loves discussing listings, partnerships, and tokenized stocks
but none of that matters if traders can’t execute size without getting hit by excessive slippage
also, the gap isn’t small either
at 10bps depth, bitget’s aggregate liquidity was over 5.8m usdt, ahead of binance, hyperliquid, okx, and bybit
this i found really interesting lol
the industry keeps focusing on who launches the next rwa product
any exchange can launch an rwa product
but not many can create an environment where traders can actually move size efficiently
that’s what ultimately determines adoption
if rwa is going to attract larger traders, funds, and eventually more traditional market participants, depth matters just as much as the asset itself
in this market, liquidity isn’t a marketing metric
it’s the product
New era of X applications has started.
X Age frontier of this era. Frontier of new narrative.
Rules are simple, connect your X, calculate the age of your account, complete tasks, invite friends and earn $XAGE token.
The game has began. https://t.co/PmuZbMTJC9
🎆2026 https://t.co/5xo7LSIrN4 New Year Airdrop🎉
Snag your slice of 10,000 $ANB rewards by finishing a few quick tasks:
🔶Connect your X account and follow @ant_fun_trade
🔶Retweet our post
🔶Make your first trade on Web (0 fees!) or in the App
🔶Invite friends and earn extra bonuses
Event ends in 15 days, check the details on the event page.
Join now: https://t.co/YgHTiUmKnk
Fully Local Wallet Control + Multi-Chain All-in-One + Zero Platform Fee = Your Future Trading!
@MURAHRIZK1@idOS_network Imagine onboarding once, reusing your verified profile anywhere, and revoking access whenever you want. That’s true digital freedom.