@TradCathEd I really appreciate the look of steely determination in the eyes of Bishop Goldade. He looks like there is a wall in front of him that he is determined to walk through. You just don't see that in many of the "soyboy" novus ordo bishops.
@FrMatthewLC It is also evil because it has replaced the holy prayers of the offertory with the Talmudic meal prayers in which the sacrifice of Jesus is redirected from the Holy Trinity to a being called the "moloch haolim", which means "prince of the world", and we all know who that is.
@RepJoeNeguse I would like to know how much money you get from the Israel lobby, and how you plan to vote on the fold Israel into the Defense budget (section244?).
Frank Wright gives one heck of a talk.
11 Minutes That Exposed the West โ Frank Wright Goes Viral (Full Intervi... https://t.co/lxlEgnTo1n via @YouTube
@Darthjimscott41@MLJHaynes Yes, the NO masses are totally invalid and became so when they replaced the traditional prayers of the offertory with those Talmudic meal prayers and corrupted the Canon of the Mass.
My opinion on the papacy is not relevant to the fact that Montini made changes to the sacraments that invalidated them; especially to the rite of episcopal consecration. With no valid bishops there are no valid priests and no valid Pope. So, yes, I would say that I do believe the that sedevacantist position is the only one that makes sense. But that is just my opinion.
@Bp_Richard_Min Just before the birth of Christ the Jewish authorities welcomed Helenism into their religion, which included the practice of sodomy. The Maccabees revolted and fled the synagogue. That is what traditional Catholics must do.
@ScoutingAlong@LourencRocka@MLJHaynes Simple, it could be true because Montini and his Masonic friends created false doctrines, invalid sacraments and a sacrilegious Mass and then foisted all three on the church.
@MLJHaynes I am just saying that logically this is what the SSPX position is regarding the conciliar church; that it contains no valid faith, priesthood or Mass. Whether or not you agree with it is not the issue; they are sedevacantists de facto.
@MLJHaynes When Father says the consecrations are "to preserve the faith, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and the priesthood" he is saying is that these things are not present in the conciliar church. This can only be true if there is no valid Pope. They are sedevacantists in all but name.