"It sets a precarious precedent when policy changes with major societal implications are pushed through on the basis of self-imposed, fictitious, or even prematurely perceived judicial constraints." Mary Sharrif @derekbmross@TrudoLemmens
Those pushing broad #MAID#euthanasia invoke 'constitutional right'. We respond w detailed legal analysis which shows: Supreme Court never required expansion; no constitutional obligation to legalize MAID mental illness & provinces could restrict MAID https://t.co/QnOUsiSFXg
Thank you to @CitizenYan for sharing his story with us! Very excited to build on the storytelling work we began with @TeresaPocock's story of self-advocacy. #ILoveMyHumanRights