@CommunityNotes this program is utter garbage. It’s just basically another chat section. Most of the notes are more misleading than the comments they are on, or they are on clear jokes or opinion, and I would rather not rate or make them anymore. How do I opt out?
@LeslynLewis So first, the irony of that comment is amazingly un-self aware, like hilariously so. Second, you act like your entire caucus was there like this liberals, ndp and bloc, which the cpc weren’t.
@BlaineFCalkins Not a single one of these votes were “non confidence”. They were voting on meaningless amendments for pageantry and theatrics. Wasting their time and our money.
@acoyne That’s a leap from the comment he made. Being part of the inquiry, the very fulcrum of its existence doesn’t inspire confidence in the globe and mails impartiality.
The same day they voted against a food program for struggling children, Pierre choreographs his minions to cheer on a fast food feast that tax payers paid for.
Taking food from children so he can have a free Big Mac. Oh so Conservative!
@journo_dale I see you changed it from a framework to report. This is even less true and more stupid. Ffs, they voted against school lunches for kids. A private members bill can become legislation dipshit.
@journo_dale So what you’re saying is, the conservatives voted no for a framework between the provinces and federal gov to fund school lunches for kids. Sounds to me more like your nitpicking in the most unbelievably redundant and reductive fashion.
@HitenPatel13 So if one is looking at the ball, one can kick another in the balls without a fouls call, slap the ball into the net with my hands, headbutt the keeper… etc
Poilievre rose in the HoC yesterday to say, quote, “kids were sending letters to Santa not to ask for presents but to ask for food”. To berate Trudeau. Shortly after his comment he voted against a National Food Program for kids put forth by the Liberals.
#WatchWhatPoilievreDoes
@CBCNews lol, yeah. “That regulatory legislation you’re doing to curb us hiking prices and balancing our consistent quarterly record breaking profits throughout departments will make us raise prices” is just pricelessly stupid.
@CCogitationis@nationalpost I wasn’t asking about the cons voting down a cpp expansion, it was genuine. I’m pretty (but maybe not) sure there was 1 last year or the year before they voted against. I can’t find any info about it because of the Alberta cpp thing dominating the 1st 4 pages of a google search.
@CCogitationis@nationalpost Yes, that’s how all group funds work, capitalism in general. When growth stops, funds and economies collapse. There’s not a company in the world that sits there and says “we are fine with our current revenue levels”, that goes the same for countries and group benefit funds.