$MMTLP $DJT $GME $FNGR These criminals robbed my family and friends of many Hundreds of thousands. And another 65.000 investors, burned by FINRA and the brokers! MMTLP The SEC and Financial Regulators, as well as congress and senate have failed! They will reap what they have sown!
🧐🧐🧐
FINRA ASSIGNED THE SERIES A PREFFERED SHARES (MMAT-1) A NEW TICKER ON 10/6/2021...$MMTLP.
On @FINRA's Daily List on that day, the line titled "Regulatory Transaction Fee Flag" indicates "Yes."
According to FINRA, they assess these fees on certain transaction is order to recover the quarterly fee it pays to the @SECgov. "Yes" indicates a fee was assessed.
❓ Who applied to have ticker symbol $MMTLP assigned to Meta's Series A Preferred Dividend Shares?
❓ Who was assessed the "Regulatory Transaction Fee."
Might it be the market maker or broker who listed $MMTLP to trade...follow the money!!!
WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY!!!
#MMTLPFiasco #CriminalEnterprise #RICO
https://t.co/6YCLgDCUZB
https://t.co/p83FEFPKc9
#MMTLP on a positive note. To avoid any confusion, I want to take time out to say Thank you to @KarmaCollects for all he has done for me and the community. MANY times he has helped me in the background on Zoom meetings and in writing important letters to my congressmen. Thank you Andrew.
Thank YOU! You’re consistently providing amazing content & quite frankly you should have 100k more followers.
I imagine you will soon enough through this “Great Awakening” as people start asking questions about why we’re in the midst of a meltdown. You’re one of the few journalists who has been covering it all. We appreciate you! 💙
Big question for @FinancialCmte before their vote Tuesday, May 7th...
Are you trying to help market makers, banks, hedge funds BLOCK the CAT system from tracking their trades?
The CAT system goes into effect this month and will be able to spot illegal trades and market manipulation, which obviously would provide a more transparent system for your constituents, so why does the @FinancialCmte have this on their docket tomorrow???
Why are they
"trying to nullify the CAT amendments, specifically the latest that was implemented 1/2/2024 that requires reporting of bona fide market maker exemption usage" - @bleedblue18
https://t.co/OVceQ7JJD8
Thanks @bleedblue18 for all your work.
@HAMShortkiller@WilliamPFarran1@DevinNunes@faulkingtruth@BasileEsq $MMTLP $FNGR $GTII $NWBO $ENZC $AMC $GME $DJT
DEVELOPING🚨 Devin Nunes States That The SEC Is “Really, Really Corrupt” And Claimed That Gary Gensler Targeted Donald Trump
Now we can see why Devin Nunes didn’t write a letter to the SEC, or FINRA regarding the naked shorts in $DJT (Fox Business 2023)
$MMTLP Ok. Enough is enough. Attorney Basile, you have not produced a single victory in a courtroom for MMTLP. Not one. Furthermore, for the most part, many of the people you seem to want to laud and heap praise on have clearly questionable motives. This could lead one to question yours. Before going any further, let’s get into that:
@SouthernOracle6, @Wendall_Roy, @FuzzyMunky_: All of them thought that buying MMTLP would not entitle you to the dividend, and to top it off, they have stated multiple times that @johnbrda and McCabe scammed us all and you think that their DD is “excellent”? You endorse THEM as would be leaders of thought? Need I say more?
@onehundredmph: Has stated multiple times that he is NOT a shareholder, and his primary focus was the naked short war and not MMTLP. I liked Danny and respect his intelligence, I was the first to welcome him here on recorded spaces. But I find it extremely odd that before you came along, he was gung ho about this having to trade to get reconciled. He even did a space with me to discuss HOW the trading could look (Holing Pool Theory). Then here you come in, and all of a sudden he changed his tune. Odd huh?
@shaayne21: Again, a nice guy, but not a shareholder. His primary focus seemed to be Retail United. They were talking about raising money from this community to act as a 501c3 AND lobbying group, not knowing that 501c3s can NOT act as lobbyists. All of this they did without even having Bylaws published. Btw, anyone seen those ByLaws yet? Anyone? Ok cool.
@HuckleberryHalt: Anyone seen Huck for the last 6 months? 🔭 I can’t see him. He went off and started a venture of his own and I wish him luck and success in doing so.
@JeffSamson51: aka @RaemenSoups. REALLY DUDE? Phhhhhh. I’ve torn this guy apart so many times in debates and he’s been wrong so many times that at this point anyone who still listens to his spaces for anything other than a laugh or to cure their constipation/insomnia should go get a brain scan. And you endorse this guy? Weren’t you SUING HIM at one point?
As for everyone else you mentioned, for the community’s sake, I’m just going to say that I respect the time that people put in, but let’s just say that the less experienced are easy targets for predators to prey on. This does NOT GO for everyone, but the readers know exactly to whom I am referring in this group.
For the life of me, I can’t understand why John Brda has not commented on your endorsement of people like Voltron and especially Raemen. Similarly, I noticed that @bleedblue18 just stays totally mum on the topic of your name. However, I find it curious that during the Khorassani petition you said you were bouncing briefs off of Kurtis, and that seemingly doesn’t happen anymore. You also didn’t mention him as a voice to be listened to, and Kurtis is respected by EVERYONE.
Maybe both John and Kurtis stay quiet because they are more diplomatic than I am, and they go by the old saying “If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything.” Or MAYBE it’s “Keep your friends close but your enemies closer”? Just a wild guess. If I’m wrong, I’ll own it.
Me? I just call it like I see it. And the way I see it, you’ve divided this community, you’ve blocked anyone who dares to ask you a question, and you’ve taken it upon yourself to spend countless hours on social media attacking a group of shareholders that you call “minions” just because they don’t blindly follow along with you. The good news is,the overwhelming majority now see the truth.
I’m calling for an end to all of this. Tonight at 8PM eastern time, I’m hosting a space. You will be unblocked. Come in, grab a mic, and let’s finally have a civil discussion on our differences. If you don’t show, I will not waste another second on you, and echoing your own sentiments, I encourage anyone else who is still in your fan club to not “fall for it” anymore. Me? I have nothing to hide so I’ll be there. Will you? Looking forward to finding out.
BREAKING NEWS 🚨 Next Bridge Hydrocarbons Petitions Tradestation Securities Seeking to Investigate Potential Claims or Suits
- A Hearing will take place on May 31st, 2024 at 1:00 PM VIA Zoom $MMTLP
🚨NEXTBRIDGE HYDROCARBONS, INC. V. TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC. FILED APRIL 15, 2023, CASE #: DC-24-05631
HEARING VIA ZOOM MAY 31, 2024 @ 1PM CST
TO VIEW OFFICIAL COURT DOCUMENTS: https://t.co/y0xGKghfLv…
$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH #MMTLPFiasco@nbhydrocarbons@Tradestation
🚨🚨NEXTBRIDGE HYDROCARBONS FILES PETITION IN CIVIL COURT AGAINST TRADESTATION REGARDING IMBALANCE OF SHARES IN $MMTLP/#NBH
“Tradestation loaned those shares to other brokers whose clients wanted to short MMTLP. Those brokers then provided the shares to their clients, who sold them into the market to implement the short position."
"The net result of those lending transactions, and subsequent sales by the borrowing brokers’ customers, is that there are more MMTLP (now Next Bridge) shares in brokerage accounts than there are shares issued and outstanding…”
https://t.co/no7R7gjAq3
$MMTLP I’m not going to go tit for tat with you in tweets, Mark. You have me blocked and the fact that you’re replying to my tweets while you have me blocked so I can’t reply is laughable. But I’ve remedied that and finally blocked you back. I’ve taken note of your response, and would be happy to address you man to man at 8PM tonight. I’ll unblock you. Show up. Let’s end this.