You should apply the same logic to Tuluvas, Konkanis, and other linguistic communities in Karnataka. You cannot impose language identity selectively. Urdu is also the mother tongue of a significant section of Karnataka’s Muslims, and linguistic diversity deserves equal respect.
Chief, One thing to know about Clash of Cards event: trading requires both clanmates to be online to complete a trade. We're looking to change this as soon as possible, so that it works for offline players too. Happy collecting!
JUST IN: Meta sold 7 million Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2025 alone.
Workers in Kenya are watching the footage.
Not metadata. Not anonymized clips. The actual videos. People undressing. People in bathrooms. People having sex. Bank cards. Medical documents.
The blurring is supposed to protect privacy. It fails constantly. The contractors see everything.
Here is the part that should stop you cold: You did not buy the glasses. You did not agree to the terms of service. You did not consent to anything. But if someone wearing Meta glasses walks into your bedroom, your bathroom, your doctor's office, your home, a contractor on the other side of the world may be watching you right now.
The person wearing the glasses consented. Everyone else in the room did not.
Meta's defense is that this is all disclosed in the privacy policy. They are technically correct. Buried in language so dense that 99% of users never read it. And even if they did, it would not matter, because the terms govern the wearer's data. Not yours. You are not a party to the contract. You are the product being annotated.
Millions of AI-enabled cameras walking around in public. Recording constantly. Uploading to servers. Reviewed by humans earning a few dollars an hour to label your most intimate moments so the algorithm gets smarter.
This is not a bug. This is the business model.
The EU is already asking questions. MEPs submitted formal inquiries to the Commission this week demanding answers on GDPR compliance. The problem is obvious: European data protection law requires consent from data subjects. Bystanders are data subjects. Bystanders never consented. The entire architecture violates the regulation by design.
Meta's response has been silence and a reference to terms of service that do not apply to the people actually being filmed.
Google Glass died because people called the wearers "Glassholes" and banned them from bars. Meta solved the social problem by making the glasses look normal. They did not solve the privacy problem. They hid it.
Seven million units sold in 2025. The installed base is accelerating. Every unit is a potential surveillance node operated by someone who may not understand what they are feeding into the system and reviewed by contractors who see everything the algorithm cannot process.
The question is not whether this becomes a scandal. The question is whether the scandal arrives before or after the glasses are on 50 million faces.
Watch the EU. If Brussels moves on GDPR enforcement, Meta faces a choice: disable human review in Europe and cripple the AI training pipeline, or accept fines that could reach billions. Neither outcome is priced into the stock.
The glasses are selling faster than ever.
The contractors keep watching.
And somewhere right now, someone you have never met is looking at footage of you that you never knew existed.
@Schandillia Iran didn't "attack Saudi Arabia". The strikes were aimed at US military bases in the region after the US-Israel attack on Iran. There's a difference between targeting American installations hosted in a country and launching a war on that country itself.
McDonald's in Germany has removed images of food from advertisements during daylight hours during Ramadan.
The Muslim population of Germany is currently estimated at 6.5%.
And the country is already changing for the invader forever than vice versa.
At Hyderabad Airport, @IndiGo6E arrival staff advised me not to issue a PIR for damaged baggage and to complain via email instead.
Later, the claim was rejected because no PIR existed.
This process contradiction needs urgent consumer authority attention.
@jagograhakjago
@SSaifullahT@eoiberlin@StadtLeipzig@EAHJena@DrSJaishankar@PMOIndia@AjitVGupte It's safer to blur or remove personal details like his ID card and address, sharing them publicly can lead to misuse and even legal issues under German and EU privacy laws. You can keep the post up with just his name and last known location.
@SattarFarooqui Agreed, Tahajjud is personal and best prayed in solitude. But the Prophet (SAW) also prayed it in congregation at times, especially in Ramadan.
Private moments with Allah are powerful, but collective worship has its own beauty. Both have their place in the Sunnah.
@IanMalcolm84@therabbithole@elonmusk The list already has Israeli Americans. Maybe you need to re-read it? If your list is only about Jews, as I understand its a religion and the list is not based on religion. For example Indian Americans follow many different religions.