@Liftaylol@lurapika_@candicoated2001@JojoPsul65734 The initial argument you commented under implied that homosexuality wasn’t natural. Mar stated that it objectively does occur in nature and is therefore natural. You changed the arguments goal posts by then stating that not everything that occurs naturally is good.
@SarahBa03330549@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 Oh look, modern papers defining sex to be more of a spectrum/mosaic.
Also defining an interruption along developmental pathways as Disorders has been contested since like 2010. Should dive into the literature more often miss “scientist”. Might learn something :P
@Suckerpuns@AnonA17953@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 I’m not your professor and you’re a self proclaimed archeologists so I assume you know how to read.
Instead, I’ll share some papers you can read if you’d like to expand your knowledge on this topic.
https://t.co/9UNGyGocSy
https://t.co/1KSjvcEeVC
https://t.co/C8Tce0WoB4
@SarahBa03330549@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 I’m conveying the current scientific stance on this topic, people are free to express themselves as they please. You seem to be the one perpetuating the “real man/woman” concept. A concept that’s based almost entirely in transphobic rhetoric.
I do doubt ur “scientist” status.
@bingaldingal@Lrigytirev@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 This is true, but you're kinda mixing some things, while biologic and scientific researches do aknowledge physical traits as part of sex, it doesnt automatically make a "third sex", while i would say that the spectrum exist within the male-to-female traits rather than a 3rd sex
@Rootbeer_1104@Lrigytirev@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 I did not mention a third sex anywhere in this thread. Intersex people are somewhere on the biological sex spectrum between male and female. But you are entirely correct, when saying there’s a spectrum between a biological male and biological female.
@Suckerpuns@AnonA17953@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 I’m not your professor and you’re a self proclaimed archeologists so I assume you know how to read.
Instead, I’ll share some papers you can read if you’d like to expand your knowledge on this topic.
https://t.co/9UNGyGocSy
https://t.co/1KSjvcEeVC
https://t.co/C8Tce0WoB4
@AnonA17953@Suckerpuns@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 If you’re defining sex based purely on functioning sex organs then you can classify people into that binary sure. However, scientifically, sex is defined using a multidimensional biological construct based on the organism's genetics, anatomical, and physiological traits.
@_P51DMustang@_BloxMaster3_@nekopet5 Your syllogism treats the anatomy of humans as binary. It is not, intersex people posses both male and female anatomy. Your proof is fundamentally flawed by assuming your set is finite, it is not. See the Quigley and Prader scale respectively.