@alightinastorm Need a better browser. We are all gatekept behind google and apple arent we.
They dont want games in browsers. They want games compiled on things they control. As far as they are concerned 3d web / web gl is good enough
The bottle neck is the browser
@jxnlco codex used google api account that had a $15 quota
got emails to say i'd used 50%, 100% and 150%.. it took hours for me to notice
looked. the bill was at $1500!
google charged my empty account $1500 4x a day for 3 weeks while gpt negotiated got it down to $150
did it save $?
@thsottiaux This is great. But recently been thinking of degoogling a lot
Wen gpt sheets, docs etc that uses open standards?
chat gpt app can be the bridge between devices...
@sunglassesface@MilitantAI@OpenAI Yeah but you just let an agent burn your entire weeks usage in a 15 minute run while it was driving in the wrong direction.
Glad I'm not the only one who realised the execution of the plan failed in at least 3 critical ways extremely quickly
@OpenAI It's incredibly fast and cool
Huge gap between plan and outcome. Plan clearly shows a squarish room. The shelves are oriented completely the wrong way. The inbound and packed also wrong (and wrong count)
Faster in the wrong direction is more tokens burned in the wrong direction
@rezoundous Not really. on 20x, working a few things at once, ultra easy to use 50% usage in just 1 day.
It's damage control. If they didn't the entire timeline would be complaining and looking for the exit.
@LyraInTheFlesh@AnthropicAI As long as we protect jimmy who decided to build a career with photoshop to make art
And the divine who can string together sentences and write good
And must protec the sacred phd at all costs who took 4 years not copying and pasting and definitely originally thinking to succes
People are not understanding. The biggest organisation at risk of AI is big government.
They aren't protecting you and your copyright. They are protecting themselves. Then they'll charge you for it.
@LyudaKozlovska What we need next is authorised AI users. It costs only €1300 a year to get your authorised EUAI user license to remove the watermark.
Fuck I am joking but they will probably run with this 😭
If you go to a doctor, and the doctor uses tools to treat you, who treated you? The doctor or the tools?
If a mechanic fixes your car using their tools, who fixed the car? The mechanic or the tools?
So when I use an AI model as a tool, apply my own judgment, vision, experience, decisions, and responsibility, and finish the work myself, by what right do they get to attach their name to that work as if it belongs to them?
Some people do not understand how dangerous this precedent is.
Today it starts with a watermark.
Tomorrow that watermark is tied to an account.
Then comes a permanent record of who created what, when, with which model, and under which account.
And suddenly every piece of work you produce carries a corporate fingerprint you never asked for.
Anthropic built their models on humanity’s accumulated knowledge. Books, code, writing, research, art, conversations, and the work of generations of human beings.
They built enormous value from human knowledge.
They built even more value from the people who paid for Claude, used it every day, pushed it to its limits, exposed its failures, and effectively helped improve the product.
Then, once they became powerful enough, they started closing things down.
They keep Methos to themselves.
They increasingly decide what users should and should not be allowed to do.
With Fable and other products, they often behave as if the user is a child who cannot be trusted with their own judgment.
Anthropic does not want to give you a tool.
They increasingly want to decide how you use that tool, what you are allowed to build with it, and eventually how the work you create with it should be identified.
That is the part people should be paying attention to.
I have disagreed with OpenAI many times. Strongly.
But I have never hated OpenAI.
Anthropic is different.
So this is my message to everyone watching this happen:
Take a position.
Cancel your subscription.
Stop funding Anthropic.
Don’t let your silence turn you into a slave.
You are the human. The model is the tool.
History remembers the people who drew the line before everyone else realized there needed to be one.
@d007_dann@petereharrell You mentioned no artists in any if your work. Rules for others but not for you i see.
The money does not care about authenticity. It cares about results and cost. Thats why you happily used others material without credit
With PS skills u have an advantage with AI. Use it.
@d007_dann@petereharrell You are a young lad. You have decided to be a design guy and your future us totally threatened by AI.
You would happliy restrict progress of the world to protect yourself
Look in the mirror. Because that is where the fraud is
@d007_dann@petereharrell and what about the other artists artwork you clearly copied in those mockups i saw. shall we dig up the originals you have plagiarized? why didn't you mention them?
would be very easy with AI to find who you've ripped from
@d007_dann@petereharrell Come back after you've updated all your images in your X canvas and behance etc with the tools you've used watermarked on the images.
Stop taking credit for that work when clearly you haven't hand drawn them. I don't see you crediting all the programmers behind the apps you use