@vincent_vancode The DTCC won’t stop at one chain. It wouldn’t make sense from an operations and governance stance
I think xrpl and a couple others will see similar onboarding
The $XRP Ledger is built for the Quantum Era.
It runs on a native account based architecture with built in key rotation.
This allows businesses, projects, and users to seamlessly switch to quantum-resistant signatures while keeping the exact same r-addresses their customers already know and trust.
Lookout for the full audit of the XRP Ledger (network, wallets, and validator layer) by Project Eleven ahead of quantum resistant cryptography deployment.
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 CFTC Chair Mike Selig says today's crypto Clarity Act vote brings US closer to becoming "the crypto capital of the world."
"America will remain the global hub for crypto innovation for years to come."
Read this before you react to the Fed today:
XRP surpassed 7.7 million non-empty wallets for the first time in its 13-year history, with active addresses hitting a five-week peak of 46,767 on March 16.
Tokenized commodities on XRP have grown from $111 million to $1.14 billion in 2026, giving XRP over 15% of global tokenized commodities.
Daily transactions on the XRP surged to nearly 3 million in the last week, with AMM pools increasing to 27,000.
Those metrics are the same at 3.5% or 3.75%.
Learn more: https://t.co/k9yv2YbKLP
How does 2 happen?
Entrenched interest and politics are very much prevalent in all organizations. Often times, short wins for posturing get prioritized over sustainable solutions that stand the test of time. The ever climbing tech debt that gets introduced as short term political wins become the operating model eventually jeopardizing teams, products, and balance sheets.
How does innovation win over bureaucracy and corporate politics? Perhaps AI is the answer… let Ripple be the case study to learn from. I’m also looking at Jack Dorsey for this
@YuvalRooz@thinkingcrypto@austincampbell Governance is more of a deciding factor than financial incentives. Does that mean that a Hedera model is more attractive here? XRPL governance isn’t financially incentivized, is its model also attractive here? #NFA
I’m a big fan of @austincampbell from his first appearance at the U.S. capitol discussing policy for crypto. He was the first one I heard say, don’t let perfect be the enemy of good when the other enemy is time. I’ve been following him since.
I would appreciate a follow up because I am a little confused by what’s said as well. To me it seems like he’s talking about entrenched interest and control being the motivator.
Critical mass would be dependent on perceived utility and equity (governance and financial incentives) appreciating at fair market value and fairly distributed across all participants.
My main question is, those that start early, they are naturally bound to be more entrenched and incentivized as they took on more risk and begin to gain “institutional” knowledge and experience from inception, so is he really saying everyone must comes to the table from the very beginning? Critical mass from inception is needed for longevity?