davidsong

🔥 🐶☕ 🔥

[davidsong @bitplane]

@_virgil19 @RokoMijic Evolution needs selection pressure. The feelings either cause movement, or they have no biological advantage and there's nothing to evolve.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@DanielW_Kiwi @StefanTMD i can tell its a slop by the nexels

[davidsong @bitplane]

The main argument against it is that there's nothing to align its internal experience with its actions. Brains with minds evolve because of selection pressure on choice, but a deterministic piece of software can't choose anything, so there's nothing to align its feelings with its actions.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@Jack1000k @yacineMTB I think at some point you'll run out of floating point precision and training time.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@mattfle02898557 @Sargon_of_Akkad Yeah it's "The ways and means act" at work. Selective enforcement against people who deserve it, or are thought to deserve it. This is why you'd handcuff a bleeding corpse, because you thought they deserved it.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@Sargon_of_Akkad The tip of this bladed article was so sharp that they weren't allowed to show it in the image. But mark my words, it was very sharp indeed.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@0xsecondsample @ai_sentience Is it not a bit suspicious that people believe software is conscious at the moment when it's complex enough to trick people into believing it is? Like, the threshold is how much you believe in it. The more you know about software, the less conscious is is.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@camhberg One frame to the right: computationalism is evolution denial as it depends on mind stuff without causal efficacy.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@BenjaminDEKR Have you tried asking claude to do it then refreshing?

[davidsong @bitplane]

I think you need to define "understands" here. If I write a simple physics simulation and enter the mass, locations and velocities of some real world objects, then I run the code and it will predict how the objects will move.
But does it "understand" what the objects are, or what a shape even is?

[davidsong @bitplane]

@RokoMijic @grok @Templarpilled @KarlRadl "sharply pointed" not sharpened blade. Looks like they did him for the tip, which isn't even featured in the evidence photo.

But it was the ways and means act - he was a burglar and they wanted to fuck him over.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@ThePrimeagen Nah the deciding is the bottleneck. Getting to the point where you need to brew on it for a while happens much faster.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@TrisH0x2A Branches, improper indentation and C's {;} mess are obviously also culpable.

[davidsong @bitplane]

How many extra hours have Brits worked for no good reason other than to subsidize net zero policies?

I'd honestly be for it if it meant we were on track to become a technological leader in renewables, but importing windmills and solar panels from China is net negative in everything but carbon.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@colinrtalbot @StephenMossGdn Do you think maybe having an argument for carrying a dagger and an unwillingness for people to challenge it, gave a defacto free pass for him to carry a second knife around, menacing people with it for ages before eventually murdering someone?

[davidsong @bitplane]

@Sir_Dammed Very nice well funded banners they had, too.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@sergeantdixie @Fudds13 @AaronBastani How on earth are we supposed to get evidence here? You're old enough to know the score, so don't pretend that we don't.

[davidsong @bitplane]

@kingovie_007 @pricefoulger Then don't look at it, the filter bubbles are pretty strong here.