@rakhitripathi you don’t understand the functionality of ChatGPT. it’s against GPT’s policy to generate responses countering some degenerate’s foolish reply
15 years long breakout + Turnaround Story.
Ready to give 200%+ returns.
YOY Net Profits increasing at 35%+✅
Fundamentally Undervalued Stock✅
Guess the name of this stock. 👇
Name will be revealed after fees -> 200 likes and 200 retweets🔁
#Nifty #StocksToBuy
#StockMarketindia #MultiBagger
🚨META'S HALF-BAKED TWITTER COPYCAT: Threat, or Blessing in Disguise?
Zuckerberg's Twitter clone is riding on Instagram to attract new downloads, but there are major issues with this new app, as well as an interesting twist to this saga...
CENSORSHIP:
Meta was caught out today when it demonstrated its partisan political bias by censoring content from people Zuckerberg doesn't like.
Its justification is that 'terms and conditions' agreed upon under Instagram have been migrated over.
Wait, what!? Why can't they simply change them?
Some conservatives had 'misinformation' warning messages attached to their accounts.
When challenged by the victims of Meta's censorship, Meta tried to backtrack by claiming that "it was an error."
Despite this, several posts have been censored.
BRIDGE FOR INSTAGRAM USERS TO JOIN TWITTER?
Meta's clone app could backfire on Zuckerberg since most of its users are from INSTAGRAM, and NOT from Twitter as many assume.
By moving to Meta's inferior imitation of Twitter, these users will be cannibalized from Instagram. In other words, they'll swap out Instagram for the Twitter rip-off that Meta has created.
Then, when they realize Twitter is a better version with more features, better privacy, and censorship-free, Meta’s clone will become a bridge for more people to move to Twitter rather than the other way around. Not sure if this will actually materialize, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it is.
A PREMATURE APP LAUNCH:
Upon using the platform, it's clear Meta released the app prematurely. They've shamelessly copied so much of Twitter's user experience that it looks like a stripped-down version.
Twitter clearly has a better product in terms of usability, functionality, responsiveness, security, and reliability.
Meta created a weak imitation of Twitter 2010.
EXAMPLES OF MISSING KEY FEATURES:
Below are just five of the many issues I have identified:
1) No web interface
This is a major drawback as a significant number of people use web browsers on PCs, but they cannot interact with the app. Being unable to migrate across various platforms is a major deficiency.
2) Account Dependency
Accounts linked to Instagram cannot be deleted without deleting both. This inability to decouple is frankly unacceptable; surely you should be as free to leave as you are to join.
3) No search function
I actually feel embarrassed for Meta. You are unable to search key terms. I know their app is new, but this seems like a very basic feature.
4) Unresolved non-compliance with privacy laws
The app is simply not available in the European Union as the privacy issues have not been resolved. Europeans value their privacy, but Meta values exploiting user data.
5) Censorship, Censorship, Censorship
Do I really need to explain?
MY THOUGHTS
While the features, the functionalities and the community are important, they are NOT the reason I use Twitter.
I use it as I stand for something. I’ve been vocal in my concerns around CENSORSHIP and the MONOPOLIZATION OF POWER, and Meta perfectly fits both these concerns.
Meta’s censorship policy has crossed the line from ‘the greater good’ to ‘benefiting the few’, and their Twitter clone is an attempt to expand their monopoly and essentially DOMINATE the narrative.
I’m not concerned though, and the reason is simple: Meta and Twitter are FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT. It’s not a battle of social media platforms, it’s a battle of CENSORSHIP versus FREE SPEECH.
Do you think Meta's clone will HELP or HARM Twitter?
Do you agree Meta and Twitter are FUNDAMENTALLY different, beyond features & functionalities?
TUC Options Trading Strategy
1 Strategy
2 Simple Rules
Made 1000% Returns on Investment
From Investment of 1 Lac to Profit of 10 Lac
6 times continuous #Zerodha 60 Trading day challenge winner
https://t.co/iuch5Laztc
watch the full video below
Kajol is a school dropout
Her husband is a college dropout
And bollywood is one of the most undereducated industry hence they make such silly movies without head & tail. But since most of them are schooled in very posh schools they speak fluently in english and many people think they are well educated as for many of us in India, english fluency is equal to education.
My nephew is 4 years and speaks very fluent American accent english and many people think he is very intelligent. Fact is he is dyslexic and struggles to even learn alphabet
He speaks good english as he is born and bought up in USA & they learn english as we learn to speak hindi or telugu or kannada
Even illiterates speak their language, right ?
Does anyone consider a child who speaks good tamil at 4 as intelligent? no they ask for his marks and how he performs in another cognitive functions
But for english it is default hence even Pappu or Alia Bhatt or Kajol are considered well educated in india and their comments are posted as some news as if they are relevant and political parties are tweeting this as if some highly qualified person has commented
The day we stop equating english = education then we have truly become independent of British
Till then we are still their mental slaves
PS - The only low educated person who ruled India were mostly from dynasty
🐜onia - School dropout
Rajiv - College dropout
Indira - College dropout
Sanjay - School dropout
Pappu - He got some paper degrees