The easiest way to gauge a person’s intelligence or unintelligence is by paying attention to what they bitch about. Give me a list of someone’s grievances and I’ll tell you exactly who or what we’re dealing with here…
⚠️ The brilliant @ComicDaveSmith drops the reminder nobody in government wants you repeating: No, the cops aren’t legally required to save you. The “protect and serve” slogan is marketing, not a contract.
Did Israel create Polymarket? 🇮🇱
Or was it just a coincidence that a college dropout collaborated with the chief architect of a cancelled DARPA project, then starts a company with the nephew and niece of Netanyahu, AND received tens of millions of dollars from Peter Thiel? 🤔
In an 1806 duel, Andrew Jackson (the 7th American president) knew he couldn't outdraw master marksman Charles Dickinson. His survival strategy was brutal: he deliberately let Dickinson shoot him first.
Under the rules of dueling, once a man fired, he was required to stand motionless on his mark and await his opponent's return fire. If Jackson rushed his shot to beat Dickinson, he might miss. By absorbing the bullet, Jackson bought himself the time to aim with absolute precision.
Dickinson fired. A cloud of dust puffed from Jackson’s coat as the bullet struck him squarely in the chest. But Jackson did not fall. He simply raised his left hand to his chest, stood perfectly still, and leveled his pistol.
Jackson survived the immediate impact because of a wardrobe trick and his gaunt physique. Standing 6-foot-1 and weighing only about 145 pounds, Jackson wore a loose, oversized dark blue frock coat. When he took his mark, he turned sideways in a bladed stance. Dickinson aimed exactly where a man's heart should be based on the drape of the coat. The bullet hit the precise spot Dickinson intended, but Jackson's actual heart was an inch or two away. The ball shattered two ribs and lodged deep in his chest cavity.
Despite the massive trauma, Jackson masked his pain through sheer willpower and spite. He despised Dickinson—who had publicly insulted his wife—and was determined not to give the marksman the satisfaction of knowing he had landed a successful shot before dying. Jackson later said, 'I should have hit him, if he had shot me through the brain.'
Jackson pulled his trigger, but the pistol stopped at half-cock. He calmly pulled the hammer all the way back, took aim again, and shot Dickinson in the abdomen. Dickinson fell and bled to death hours later.
Jackson casually walked away from the dueling ground with his surgeon, hiding his wound until they were out of sight of Dickinson's seconds. It was only when the surgeon noticed blood sloshing inside Jackson's left boot that he realized the future president had been hit. The bullet was too close to the heart to be safely removed, and Jackson carried it inside his chest for the remaining 39 years of his life.
#drthehistories
There are ‘dark forces’ that are operating within the political, military, intelligence & banking infrastructure of this country that are not loyal to this country. They have full spectrum control over the criminal justice system and have their place people embedded across this system.
There is no patriotism in any of them. Their loyalties exist with another country, they are hiding in plain sight funded by a phalanx of both private and publicly funded monies. A seemingly inexhaustible supply of monies used to cajole, threaten and blackmail.
Their influence in all of the major political parties is recorded. Their multi decades old infiltration and control of our education systems from nursery to university level is complete. The teaching colleges churn our political ideologues from both the left & right who in reality are doing the work of these faceless entities.
There is now not a single Western leader that is freely elected. Every last one is selected beforehand. The dance of deception that is ‘democracy’ has ended and yet it has not been comprehended by the masses who are continually entranced by the ‘bread & circus’ provided by these same deceptive entities.
Andy Burnham has seemingly been plucked from nowhere to be installed as Prime Minister. Not one of the other 410 Labour MPs have raised any suspicions or concerns about this. Why? Is this normal?
Today it is reported that the same Andy Burnham has admitted that large tax rises are on the way. The great majority of the people of this UK are financially desperate and so one must ask where does he expect those people to find those monies?
The answer must now be abundantly clear. He/they do not care. YOU are NOT the priority. The moment you both realise and accept this is the moment you see this fiction of a system for what it is. A LIE.
Whether you wish to believe this or not, the next PM is a plant. MI5, SIS, GCHQ are all aware of this. The question then arises, ‘who are they responsible too?’
🗣️ "The fact that the Soviet Union also invaded Poland in September 1939 was alright with Britain and France.
They didn't declare war on the Soviet Union because the Soviet Union was for all practical purposes under Jewish rule.
They did declare war on Germany because Germany under Hitler had broken loose from the grip of the Jews and had freed:
-the German media
-and German education
-and German finance
-and German politics
-and German culture
from Jewish influence and was in the process of kicking all of the Jews out of Germany. That was the reason for the Second World War, not Polish freedom or Polish territorial integrity.
That was the reason why when in April 1943 the German army discovered the mass graves of some of the 25,000 Polish officers and intellectuals murdered by Jewish communists and invited the International Red Cross and journalists from many nations to view the evidence. The controlled media in Britain and the United States ignored the evidence and blamed the atrocity on the Germans. That was the reason why at the end of the war, those countries which had gone to war ostensibly to ensure the freedom of Poland agreed to turn Poland and Latvia and Hungary and the rest of Eastern Europe over to the communist butchers who had carried out the massacre of the elite of the Polish nation.
Of course, the communists economically drained and ruined all of these countries. And these communists were Jews, which is to say, the Jews were the prime movers in the communist regimes imposed on those countries after the war and also were the primary beneficiaries of the regimes:
-In Hungary, for example, there was the regime of the communist Jew Maciej Likosi, followed by another communist Jew, Ernő Gyerl.
-In Romania, the communist Jewish Anna Palker ruled the country as First Secretary of the Central Committee.
-In Poland, the Minister for State Control was the communist Jew Roman Zimbrowski.
-In Czechoslovakia, the Secretary General of the Communist Party was the communist Jew Rudolf Slansky.
-In Yugoslavia, while Tito held the spotlight, the communist Jew Mocsi Fiati was the Chairman of the National Assembly and President of Serbia.
And so it went. And this in a Europe whose Jews supposedly had all been holocausted by Hitler.
There were tens of millions of Hungarians and Poles and Latvians and Serbs and other Eastern Europeans under the yoke of communism who were wishing that Hitler had actually holocausted the Jews. These communist Jews were so hated by the Eastern Europeans they ruled and exploited that there was constant turmoil. And after the Hungarian uprising in 1956, many of the leading communist Jews were replaced by Gentile frontmen while the Jews continued to exploit the people from behind the scenes.
Even as the communist regimes of Eastern Europe began collapsing during the last 15 years or so, and their economies were privatized, Jews continued to plunder the people among whom they lived. Using money from their brethren abroad and collusion with their corrupt kinsmen still in the various governments, they managed to buy up the most valuable factories, mines, and other national resources at fire sale prices and then melt them for all they were worth."
-William Pierce about WW2
Lol. Lmao even. Nah
1. Animals don't even have sex for pleasure. God reserved that only for humans. Animals do it based on instinct and pheromones
2. Male homosexuality in animals is b/c of two reasons:
- A: Dominance. One male is subjugating another male
- B: Pheromones and hormones. The male is just humping anything near him
Neither of these are a homosexual relationship as they are claiming here (or maybe they ARE the same and homo relationships are just about those two things 🤔)
3. There is no female homosexuality. So that should tell you something 🤷♀️
4. Animals don't have morals or reason. They have no intellect so they are not judged for their actions on a moral basis. You're lowering homosexuals to the level of animals. Quite an admission, honestly
5. Animals commit murder, grape, assault, genocide and torture. Animals should not be your moral standard. It's amazing this has to be said
Abraham Lincoln and the Rothschilds: The Real Cause of the Civil War
Charles E. Coughlin (1940)
One of the most controversial and difficult-to-find Civil War conspiracy pieces ever published, this short work originated as two articles printed in Social Justice in February 1940. In just a few dozen pages, Coughlin presented a dramatic alternative narrative of the Civil War, arguing that the conflict was not primarily about slavery but was driven by international financial interests seeking profit, debt, and control.
President Abraham Lincoln challenged powerful banking interests when his administration issued hundreds of millions of dollars in government-backed “greenbacks” during the war rather than relying entirely on private lenders. Coughlin claimed this threatened the profits and influence of major European financiers, particularly the Rothschild family, and he cited an alleged 1863 letter warning that government-issued money could undermine the existing financial order. The pamphlet presents Lincoln’s monetary policies as the true source of conflict between the administration and international banking interests.
The book goes further, connecting these financial disputes to Lincoln’s assassination. It argues that powerful forces had a motive to remove a president who demonstrated that a government could finance itself without becoming dependent on private banking interests. Later reprints expanded the narrative with discussions of John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln’s ancestry, and other controversial subjects.
What makes it especially provocative is its focus on details that have fueled speculation for generations: the missing pages from Booth’s diary, the decision to try the accused conspirators before a military tribunal rather than a civilian court, the remarkable security failures that allowed Booth access to Lincoln, the disputed evidence against some defendants, and lingering questions about whether every participant in the conspiracy was ever identified. Coughlin presents these events as pieces of a larger hidden story involving finance, politics, and power.
He also highlights the little-known arrival of Russian naval fleets in New York and San Francisco during the Civil War, portraying Alexander II of Russia as an ally of the Union who allegedly helped deter foreign intervention at a critical moment in the conflict.
Whether viewed as a forgotten piece of political literature, a controversial monetary critique, or a classic example of twentieth century conspiracy writing, the pamphlet remains one of the most direct attempts to connect Lincoln, the Civil War, international banking, and the assassination into a single overarching narrative.
Nearly a century after its publication, it continues to circulate among collectors of rare and controversial historical works, ensuring that the debate surrounding its claims has never entirely disappeared.