నేనె ఈ ఉర్వినెల్ల శాశించవలదె
నేనె ఐశ్వర్యమెల్ల సాధించవలదె
నేనె మన బంధుహితులకు ఘనతలన్ని కట్టతెచ్చిన ఘనకీర్తి కొట్టవలదె...
That SVR introduction. Na Bhotho, Na Bhavishyath ! But the GOAT scene follows after that, when Subhadra devi holds the bow!
అఖిల రాక్షస మంత్ర తంత్ర అతిశయముననుచు,
శ్రీ కృష్ణ సోదరి నగుదునేని,
దివ్య శస్త్రాస్త్ర మహిమల తేజరిల్లు,
అనఘ అర్జును పత్నినే యగుదునేని 🔥🔥
2010: 76 CRPF jawan killed by Naxals
2010: Dimagi Naxals in JNU celebrated CRPF killings
2010: Congress goes JNU & pleads in front of Naxals
2013: Sonia Gandhi's NAC member convicted of sedition for helping Naxals
2025: Rahul Gandhi shares "Kitne Hidma Maroge Har Ghar se Hidma Niklega" video from his YouTube.
If this does not prove Congress is Dimagi Naxal what else will!
According to the Valmiki Ramayana, when Shri Rama killed 14,000 Rakshasas, the entire battlefield was covered in their blood and flesh, resembling a scene from hell. The severed heads and bodies of the slain Rakshasas were floating in pools of blood, while Shri Rama stood on the battlefield, drenched in their blood.
Moreover, even before the battle began, Rama had sent Maa Sita to a cave with Lakshmana to ensure her safety.
But in the Ramayana movie, we are shown Maa Sita fighting alongside Shri Rama against the Rakshasas.
What kind of Ramayana have they made? 🤔
I went back to read the original Valmiki Ramayana (Aranya Kanda) and the difference between the actual account and what's being shown in the new Bollywood Ramayana is quite surprising
In the original account Shurpanakha threatens to eat Sita after her advances towards Ram and Lakshmana are rejected. Shri Ram then instructs Lakshmana then Lakshmana cut off her nose and ears
but in the movie, the entire context is changed. Shurpanakha takes Sita's form to manipulate Ram and when Lakshmana cuts her nose, Sita questions his decision, saying her mistake wasn't that serious and that he had no right to harm a woman's appearance
That's a completely different narrative and moral framing.
Cinematic adaptations can have creative interpretations but when you're adapting an epic like the Ramayana shouldn't the original characters events and context be treated with some responsibility?
@GemsOfBollywood #RamayanaMovie #RamayanaReview
British national Soni Razdan is calling Diwali anti-national, while her son-in-law is playing the role of Lord Ram, a character associated with the very festival she is criticising.
A foreign national calling an Indian festival anti-national. What could be more hypocritical than this? 😅