Claude Mythos is live. The cost to build something has never been lower. The risk to DeFiers has never been higher.
Have fun. Be responsible. And if you haven’t already, cancel your open wallet connections with https://t.co/SrgH29tr9C. 2 minutes to protect your wealth.
Crypto’s institutionalization is finally giving the industry the maturity it’s needed. The standards are getting tighter, the products are getting more serious, the audience is getting bigger. None of that happens without institutional-grade infrastructure underneath.
The builders best positioned for the next cycle aren’t the pure crypto natives or the tradfi people moving over. It’s the ones who’ve spent years building in crypto but understand how real finance actually works. That intersection is small and it’s about to be a goldmine.
Also dug into my transaction history. 47 failed txs on Ethereum since 2022, totaling over $300 in wasted gas.
Oh, and 110+ on Solana. Total gas was less than $10, though realized losses likely significantly higher than on ETH given tx fail rates on volatile memecoin orders
2026 has shown that we're all one bad link away from losing everything.
Connect a wallet to a phishing site, sign a bad transaction, download the wrong software or app, or just approve a malicious contract that you can't understand anyway.
Web2 has entire fraud departments and security standards for this. They reverse charges. They flag transactions. They freeze funds.
Crypto instead promotes decentralization. This is right. But there needs to be some sort of standardized safety net or security protocol. We can't just keep blaming the user for not reading a contract or getting socially engineered. These scams and hacks are too sophisticated and they're increasingly accessible with AI.
This is not the way to universal adoption. Idealism has taken us this far. Now it's time for pragmatism to enter the chat.
AI agents are supposed to be the future of finance. Feels like half of ct is launching bots that manage your portfolio by running trades, finding yield, and rebalancing positions.
How do you track your bot's activity though? Would be uncomfortable to wake up new positions, unexplained P&L, and no way to verify or support anything in normal times, let alone at tax time.
At this point, it feels more like trusting a potentially rogue black box software with your finances that creates more liabilities than opportunities?
Am I way off?
Lending position liquidations are the most difficult case for cost basis tracking.
Half your collateral gets sold at a discount you didn’t choose, debt gets repaid out of proceeds, and what’s left in your wallet has no clean acquisition record.
The chain shows a complex multi-step transaction. The tracker shows a balance that suddenly dropped. Reconstructing what actually happened for tax purposes would be extremely challenging even if all protocols had the same liquidation mechanism and standard.
If you’ve held an Aave position for more than 12 months and exited this year, your tracker probably reported the entire withdrawal as capital gains.
The IRS doesn’t see it that way and the difference can be thousands in misreported income 🧵👇
Most LP trackers show you the dollar value of your position and stop there. In reality, there should be four numbers.
We wrote the full breakdown of what's actually happening inside your position and what an LP tracker should be showing you instead.
https://t.co/ifq3NETX5U
Deposit 10 ETH into Aave. 1.5 years later you have 10.4 aETH.
Most trackers see the new aETH balance and treat the extra 0.4 as either a separate asset with no cost basis or a balance change with no event behind it.
Neither is right.
The aToken is a rebasing claim on the underlying, and that yield is income with a basis tied to the day each chunk hit your wallet.
The difference matters, especially at tax time.
You provided liquidity to a Uniswap pool six months ago. Your tracker shows the LP token in your wallet and a current dollar value next to it. That's it.
Behind that number, four different things are happening that change the actual value of your position. 🧵👇
Three numbers your tracker should be telling you but probably isn’t.
👉What you paid for each position
👉What you’ve paid in fees and gas across that position
👉What that position has actually returned net of those costs
The single dollar amount most apps show skips all three.
You bought 1 $BTC on Coinbase at $65k and 1 BTC on Kraken at $22k. Sell from Kraken when you meant to sell from Coinbase and your tax bill just jumped by $8,600 for the same sale.
That’s what new accounting requirements punish now.
Cryptofolio shows you which lots sit where so you know you’re selling from the right one.
Beta signups closing soon. Grab your spot now
https://t.co/jeBgQhhY1l
Been working on how Cryptofolio handles stablecoins lately. Harder problem than I expected.
Our first dev team hardcoded stables' values to 1 USD. The SVB depeg down to $0.87 in 2023 is a prime example why this doesn't work. You also can't pull live prices from one oracle because different DEXes priced the depeg differently for hours. Nor can you use the peg value as cost basis either because that's not what the holder actually paid.
Every stablecoin decision has a second-order tax consequence. Solved most of it, but as always, real world use and feedback will be worth its weight in gold.
Full breakdown of how to save on taxes, what offsets what, how crypto losses net against every kind of gain, and the ETF question we'd all like a clear answer on.
https://t.co/KO9BZbt12o
Dex aggregator transactions are incredibly complex to track. Didn’t know how complex until we dug into it.
I was swapping SOL straight to ETH on an aggregator all year. Or so I thought.
Looked through the actual txns at tax time and almost every one of them routed through USDC to get the best price. There were two transactions per trade, not one. I wouldn’t have known unless I analyzed the tx hash myself.
Routing through USDC reset my lot queue from 2023. That was USDC I picked up at $0.87 during the SVB depeg. Every aggregator swap through USDC at today’s $1 value meant I owed taxes on those gains.
Brokers don’t report any of this. Koinly missed it. Spent a weekend fixing it.
Then made sure @CryptofolioApp handled it correctly. It does now.
Never trust software built by people who never use it themselves.
We wrote the full breakdown covering depegs, the Beautiful Bill fix, what CLARITY and PARITY would change, and the four things most trackers miss on stablecoin swaps.
https://t.co/pWE6rVovKM
DeFi has had ~$600m hacked this month and half of these protocols are still in limbo. Kelp, Drift, etc. The tokens are sitting in your wallet but you can’t touch them, can’t sell them, nor move them.
This gets really messy from a tax perspective. As long as the tokens have paper value, haven’t actually been removed from your possession, and the protocol hasn’t been formally declared dead, the loss isn’t deductible. Your cost basis is stuck and you’re carrying phantom assets that you can’t do anything with.
Godspeed to anyone with funds on these protocols or caught in these hacks. Brutal start to the year.
We published a full write-up on DeFi hacks and tracking. It covers each scenario in detail, the tracking failures specific to each one, the tax documentation you’ll need, and what to check right now if you had funds in any of the protocols hit this month.
https://t.co/4lJPM3REF7
Pick a token you bought on an exchange and transferred to a wallet. Does your tracker show what you originally paid?
If it shows $0 or today’s price at FMV, your P&L has been wrong since the transfer. That one check tells you more than anything else.
Here are three tests to test your tracker right now 👇
https://t.co/QOrd1XUE1N
An active DeFi user paying $8 average gas across 265 transactions spends over $2,100 in ETH on gas alone.
Each fee is reportable activity your tracker never recorded. The individual amounts are tiny. The cumulative effect on your P&L is not.
See how gas fees actually affect your cost basis 👇https://t.co/GzqLDvpity