JAKE

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@BobHRoss @Acts5_29 @RightToLifeUK This doesn't answer the question. I'm sure there is enough space to give at least one good reason.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@lincs67 @OurKantoLife @RichardWLewis S/he can't.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@markoftheD @DrAseemMalhotra How much are you being paid to cover up for the death shot? Seriously, I'd like to know.

[PrimeTimeDanger @PrimeTimeDanger]

@open_dialogueuk @SpartaJustice You can actually educate chatgpt. This is little, but it shows a possibility. Sorry for blur, posting elongated screenshots on my phone does that. Tap the pic to see all of it

[Steve Guy @footwisdom]

@thecoastguy The powers that be conveniently forgot to tell us this 👇
A mere oversight I’m sure.

[josé Valera Colona @Josecarlosval1]

Help us stop the censorship of #prolife and #profamily voices!
@ElonMusk @CitizenGO #StopCensorshipTwitter

https://t.co/nMuDzGM326

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 You've just contradicted yourself. If an unborn is not living how can obtaining oxygen allow it to live?

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 How this answers my question I do not know!

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 You're not too bright yourself either are you. Corse it's a stable life form. What do you expect you are?!! You do realise you yourself was growing inside your mother once don't you? The body of an unborn does not belong to the mother and has full rights to live. Are you jealous?

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 This does not answer the question. Please answer it.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 Yes, you're correct. Sperm fertilises egg and another human baby starts developing and guess what? Both sperm and egg are living human cells! If they weren't there would be no possible way a baby could even grow inside the mother.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 An unborn baby

1. Is not lifeless. It is a living human being.

2. All human life is sacred

3. Has the right to live.

4. Is not a disease.

Hope these answers your question.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 "For a child to be a child, it needs to be born"

This is incorrect. If a baby was born at 22 weeks would you still say it's not a child? The baby hasn't fully developed after all and it's 9 months of pregnancy, not 22 weeks.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 Unborn babies are just as a live as you or I am. They just haven't developed properly yet.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 Incorrect.

1. An unborn baby has life inside him/her. S/he is a living human being and if the unborn is left to develop to full term s/he will have a life later on so yes, the unborn is being robbed of its life. The clumps of cells are still human and not atoms and energy.

[JAKE @blooorbs]

@EmmaBea31325952 @SHS_2015_1997 You're correct, a baby is a very young child. unborn babies are very young children. They just haven't developed properly yet.