Otto Correct

Dad, Husband, Rationalist, Logician, Scientist, Engineer, Biker, Boater, Diver, Driver, Pilot, Navigator.

Opposed to misinformation, dishonesty, and zealotry.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@BrockRiddickIFB You (in the 1890s):

ATOMS have NEVER BEEN OBSERVED!

REVERSE ENGINEERED to CORRECT for GAS LAW DISCREPANCIES observed in reality, to MAINTAIN a PRESUPPOSITION (kinetic theory)

They exist ONLY in math.
They call them 'indirectly observable.'"

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@aten_ichnaten That is just a random troll card being played.
This moron will never learn anything from us. He does not want to know what S band is.

These endlessly idiotic meme-streams will continue forever, until we all recognize them for what they are, low effort engagement bait.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@ken_caudle @haprho @Shannaro_Cold @did8hurtu Separating effect from cause simply exposes your ignorance.

Physics models how reality actually behaves based on measurable evidence.

Physics was not developed to give meaning to your beliefs or to care about your feelings.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@ken_caudle @haprho @Shannaro_Cold @did8hurtu I gave you a falsifiable test: The barometric gradient perfectly matches the mathematical model of gravity.

If the math failed, the hypothesis would be falsified.

Ignoring a successful test because it dismantles your worldview is the definition of religious bias.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@ken_caudle @Shannaro_Cold @did8hurtu Ken,

Demanding a laboratory experiment for a planet-scale phenomenon is dishonest goalpost moving.

Trying to tar physics with the slander of "faith" is high irony for an anti-science evangelist.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@ken_caudle @Shannaro_Cold @did8hurtu It is totally falsifiable. My hypothesis explicitly predicts that atmospheric pressure must decrease with altitude according to Newton’s law of gravity. If a barometer shows the pressure gradient fails to match that exact gravitational math, the hypothesis is instantly disproven.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@ken_caudle @Shannaro_Cold @did8hurtu I'm saying the hypothesis has not been, and will probably not be, falsified, despite amply meeting the falsifiability criteria with a sound hypothesis that well describes the claim.

Faith is an irrelevant and weak attempt at sophistry.

Make a better, falsifiable hypothesis.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read That boat wasn't over the curve, you complete imbecile.
Maybe you're just a liar. Who knows?

Try that with any ship that has already gone over the horizon.

It's absolutely asinine that you are denying something that EVERY person who has sailed the seas can confirm.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

The X user, PowFish @pooopypeepy is an egregiously incompetent flat-earther.

He cannot understand most basic things.

He asked for one of my debunks of flat-earth and I linked to a recent one.

He forgot how dumb he is, so he repeated his dumb claim about the tan() function.

1/

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read No you don't.

Your DK and deeply delusional narcissism are fooling you.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @bits2read @jpvanhoy I have shown many kinds of verifiable evidence to you.

This is one you haven't responded to at all.

https://t.co/qwoaa6apSE

Are you fully incompetent or just trolling?

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@ken_caudle @haprho @Shannaro_Cold @did8hurtu If you want physics to declare what gravity "is" instead of the framework that perfectly models its behavior, you're looking for a religion, not a science.

Everything we need to know about gravity's relation to Earth's shape is already known.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @AustralisPiper @bits2read Do you think I work? LOL!

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @AustralisPiper @bits2read If Earth was really flat, any competent person could make a constant-scale map in a few minutes.

100% of the people who try to make that map will utterly fail. Are you afraid to attempt it?

What kind of weak god would approve of you lying about his obviously spherical creation?

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read I copied nothing, you imbecilic liar.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read Absurd. You're not likely to have attended any university at all. If you did, what topics did you study? They surely weren't science or math related.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@ken_caudle @Shannaro_Cold @did8hurtu It's a nice, well-tested hypothesis.

You can test it yourself with a smartphone barometer.

You can compare the actual pressure gradient to the physics that predicts it.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read You're not smart about science topics. Are you smart in some other field? Maybe. You haven't said.

Just for you, I'll try to remember that an 8th grade literacy level is too high. I will target a 6th grade literacy level instead.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read I work for nobody. I hire people who work for me.

Your fear is moronic. You're a frenzied religious moron.

There is no Satan. If a god exists, it doesn't need protection! How weak is it?

Yes, really bad people exist, but praying won't fix shit.

Reenter reality and fight back.

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read Uh, no.

Which word isn't a common, everyday word in the flat-earth universe?

[Otto Correct @blottocorrect]

@pooopypeepy @jpvanhoy @bits2read @grok Is the sealion upset?