avee

recreational programming

[avee @blueavee]

what it feels like to tweet about my nvim config

[kache @yacineMTB]

what it feels like to update my nvim config

[george hotz archive @geohotarchive]

The Eternal Sloptember https://t.co/kFIW7LNhNd

[avee @blueavee]

i think there’s room for an ai tool built specifically for neovim, not something like cursor or claude code that takes full control, but a lightweight assistant that simply makes certain workflows faster while keeping the developer fully in control.

[avee @blueavee]

@Celmaun @theo Hey @ThePrimeagen

[Vjekoslav Krajačić @vkrajacic]

All I used to build File Pilot:
A text editor and debugger, a browser to read docs, and a note taking app.

[avee @blueavee]

@AnxiousHolly none are in tech, delete your account.

[Ryan Fleury @rfleury]

Human oversight is fundamentally necessary for producing anything consumed by humans. In fact, anything consumed by an entity with a value system must inherently be produced by an entity *with a similar value system* (this is why trade can extend across some national/cultural boundaries but not all). Obviously some value structures are more relevant in some domains than others—trading bare necessities (energy, food, shelter) is easier than complex value-related products.

“Intelligence” sufficient to replace human work makes this doubly true, because specific value structures (e.g. creating goods that are not to the detriment of their consumer) are not intrinsic to intelligence nor can they be explicitly programmed.

Furthermore, given that software is (for all intents and purposes) an ~infinite space, human demand can expand into that space arbitrarily, requiring more and more software work. Every serious programmer knows the feeling that there is effectively an unbounded amount of work to do, and projects to investigate, almost certainly until they get bored or die. Thus, even with improved efficiency and fewer humans needed to do oversight on any one project, you’d still expect a larger number of human overseers in the end.

In practice, given that the so-called “intelligence” is extremely limited, it’s capable of producing a small fraction of that total space. Thus, you’d expect supply for that fraction to rapidly increase, despite a fixed limit on demand for it—demand will be magnified in areas with much less supply, which require greater human oversight and authorship.

[avee @blueavee]

@Pallavi_345 Easy for deleting your account

[avee @blueavee]

@Saanvi_dhillon Delete your account

[avee @blueavee]

@Surendar__05 deleting your account is necessary

[avee @blueavee]

@Samaira_twts delete your account

[avee @blueavee]

@adahstwt best alternative is deleting your account

[avee @blueavee]

@CodeEdison delete your account

[avee @blueavee]

@Pallavi_345 delete your account

[avee @blueavee]

@Zinny_Edmund delete your account

[avee @blueavee]

@original_ngv delete your account

[avee @blueavee]

@justbyte_ easy for deleting your account

[avee @blueavee]

@vivoplt Delete your account

[avee @blueavee]

@Surendar__05 deleting your account

[avee @blueavee]

@ritu_twts delete your account